About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-233183.3 1 (1995-09-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabllf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




GAO            United States
               General Accounting Office
               Washington, D.C. 20548

               Office of the General Counsel




               B-233183.3


               September 14, 1995



               Ms. Jeanne DiGange
               Certifying Officer
               U.S. Department of Agriculture
               National Finance Center
               P.O. Box 60,000
               New Orleans, LA 70160

               Dear Ms. DiGange:

               This letter is in regard to Mrs. June P. Thomas's claim for the unpaid compensation
               due her deceased son, Mr. John A. Thomas, an employee of the Department of
               Agriculture at the time of his death in 1987. The disbursement of this compensation
               was the subject of our decision, Estate of John A. Thomas, 68 Comp. Gen. 284
               (1989), in which we considered competing claims by Mrs. Thomas and
               Mr. Manuel de Jesus Thomas Rivas, who claimed to be Mr. John Thomas's son.
               Resolution of the matter required a determination of whether Mr. Rivas legally
               qualified as Mr. Thomas's son, a matter we found to be too uncertain for us to
               resolve. We concluded therefore, that the claims were too doubtful for payment to
               either claimant, and we left the claimants to pursue their remedy in a court of
               competent jurisdiction.

               Subsequently, in June P. Thomas v. Office of Personnel Management, No. 92-3373
               (Fed. Cir. April 5, 1993),1 copy enclosed, which involved Mr. Thomas's Civil Service
               Retirement Fund lump-sum benefit, the court concluded that Mr. Rivas had not
               established his entitlement to payment and ordered payment of the lump-sum
               benefit to Mrs. Thomas. The determinative issue before the tribunals involved in
               that action was the same issue involved in the claim before our Office, i.e., whether
               Mr. Rivas had established that he is Mr. Thomas's son. In view of the court's



               1Reversing a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board directing payment to
               Mr. Rivas, on the basis that he qualified as Mr. Thomas's surviving child under
               5 U.S.C. § 8342(c) (1988).


804920

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most