About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-141529 1 (1972-06-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobablcj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


          RESTR1CTED - Not t be 1'eegd 6Ur-I~d  Mhe    a P~~~-'J
               Acc~u     e  xcept *t    basis Of
        Sby th eflx     fLg.laicUWov

          11NITS                WASHINGTON. D.C. 2048IV

                     RELEASED                                       V1
    B-141.29

    Dear Mr. Cabell:                                                           I7

        This is in response to your letter of May 11, 1972, requesting that the <4
   General Accounting Office review and evaluate the bids for eqUipment recently c1
   received by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA).     21
   WHATA received these bids as part of the second step in their two-step formalI
- advertising procedure in contracting for the purchase of 300 raid transit
    cars and related items (WMATA prospective contract 2Z0061). The bids were
    opened on May 3, 1972, and the low bidder was found to be Rohr Industries,
    Inc., of Chula Vista, Calif.; however, the award of the contract by WMATA
    is being held in abeyance pending completion of our review. Rohr is cur-
    rently constructing similar equipment for the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid
    Transit District (BART).
        Our inquiry included interviews with officials of WMATA and BART and an

    examination of pertinent records of these agencies.

    RESPONSIBLE BID

         In the request it was stated that the original estimate by WMATA for
    this equipment was $119,043,364, that two of the qualified bidders were within
    $18,000 of each other at $103,130,000 plus, and that the low bidder submitted a
    bid of $91,607,000. Some people suspect that the low bid by Rohr is an irre-
    sponsible bid, submitted in the hope that suggested changes and claims for
    overruns will result in materially increased payments.

    Findin'g

         The 'WMATA estimate prepared on April 7, 1972, includes (1) 300 rapid
    transit cars at $116,728,500 (a unit price of $389,095), (2) a squeeze test
    at $20,000, (3) a truck test at $50,000, (4) one lot of spare parts at
    $1,248,864, and (5) a user education program at $1,O00,000--for a total of
    $119,047,364. The WMATA unit price estimate of $389,095 was reached by com-
    paring their proposed rapid transit cars with those of a bidder of a recent
    New York transit car contract (in which the unit price was $294,960) and then
    estimating the cost for any differences between the cars.

        The estimate prepared by WMATA, therefore, did not have the precision
    that would be characteristic of an engineering estimate derived from a
    thorough analysis of the material and labor requirements for the items to
    be built.

        The Rohr overall bid of $91,607,274 includes (1) 300 transit cars at
    $89,398,500 (a unit price of $297,995), (2) a squeeze test at $53,744, (3)
    a truck test at $29,553, (4) one lot of spare parts at $1,903,898, and (5)
    a user education program at $221,579. We concluded that Rohr's bid was fully
    responsive to the WMATA request.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most