About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-180063 1 (1974-03-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is:          R2EsTnocTEo - miot to he neamsed outside the Genieral o  24<
         Accounting Gfffe except~ on t _ h  Of sPOCific 3Pr0a
   LUR   by tale Office of Gogrsf ana Reago  a record~ ol which
         is kept by                   UNITED&& %%in uliainraiich, OAS
      o ~ ~~~~               ~~ s ,pby ror.RGNRAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


            B-8063RELEASED
     B-180063                  RMAR 2 0 1974

     The Honorable William A. Steiger
     House of Representatives

     Dear Mr. Steiger:

          In accordance with your request of November 14, 1973,
     GAO has'examined selected Federal contracts with the che mical
     iijsty to find out whether unethical ,rocupractices
     exist. You informed us that the Wisconsin Department of
     Justice had found a number of unethical practices in the
     sale of chemical products to municipalities.

          At 11 Federal installations in Wisconsin, North Dakota,
     and Minnesota, we examined procurement records, including
     brochures, catalogs, and vendors' sales literature, and in-
     quired into salesmen's offers to Federal purchasing agents.
     We identified 28 instances when premiums were offered with
     purchases. Of the 28 offers, 9 originated from chemical
     suppliers.

          For example, a digital electric clock was offered with
     a purchase of $500 or more. The premiums usually had esti-
     mated values of less than $25. We identified only one in-
     stance when agency officials had accepted a gift. Two elec-
     tric carpet shampooers having a total estimated value of
     $80 were accepted at a military base with the purchase of
     30 cases of carpet shampoo. Base officials donated the
     shampooers to the family services unit for loan to occupants
     of military housing units.

          We also examined contracts awarded by the General Serv-
     ices Administration for selected chemical products placed
     on the Federal Supply Schedule. We found no evidence of
     offers of premiums by prospective or successful chemical
     suppliers to Federal procurement officials.

          We discussed with a member of your staff the results
     of our examination and the difficulties in proving that
     premiums offered had been accepted. He agreed that a more
     extensive examination would not be warranted.


0

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most