About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-159104 1 (1970-11-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkqu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

           EYthe aglc voUM3,are~                1%VhS
             uh C MPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
 U                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20S48




 B- 159104                                     €  . .,

 Dear Senator Spong.                    A                  M8Soa-M~
                         P   g       -.     , LM089800

      In accordance with your reque t dated March 17, 1970, we have
examined into a proposed exchang between the Department of1 theT
terior and Mr. Charles Fairchild and the Richmond, Fredericksburg,
and Potomac Railroad Company. This proposed exchange provides for
granting access rights to the George Washington Memorial Parkway for
a proposed development by Mr. Fairchild. The development is referred
to as the Potomac Center and is located near the Washington National
Airport. Access would be gained to and from the Parkway via a bridge
which would be constructed by Mr. Fairchild or the Richmond, Freder-
icksburg, and Potomac Railroad Company, at no expense to the Govern-
ment. Approximately 1.3 acres of federally owned land would be made
available for the necessary connecting ramps.

      In return for granting access to the Parkway, the Government
would receive title to about 28.8 acres of land owned by Mr. Fairchild
at Dyke Marsh, which is about 1- 1/2 miles south of the Woodrow Wilson
Bridge. The exchange agreement provides that the vehicular bridge to
be constructed across the Parkway could be utilized by the Park Ser-
vice to provide better access to existing recreation facilities on
Daingerfield Island. (See map on p. 18 of encl. I.)

      In a June 12, 1970, meeting with members of your staff, we agreed
to furnish you with information concerning the derivation of the value of
each item involved in the proposed exchange. It was agreed that, be-
cause factors which could have a significant effect on the value of cer-
tain of the items involved in the proposed exchange had not been fully
resolved and because of a lack of adequate documentation supporting the
determination of certain values, we would not offer any conclusions on
the reasonableness of the values involved in the exchange.

      The matters considered in our review are discussed in detail in
enclosure I. Our comments on the items that appeared to be of most
interest to you are summarized below.

      The exchange agreement, in essence the same as the draft agree-
ment transmitted to the House and Senate Committees on Interior and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most