About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-205755 1 (1982-12-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkgv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                   COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
      4' /                   WASHINGTON D.C. W05.4
                  llI                                         l 11111111 II1 IIIIII Ili HI

                                                                120434

B-205755                                 December 6, 1982



The Honorable John D. Dingell
Chairman, Subcomittee on
  Oversight and Investigations
OCmnittee on Energy and Cocimrce
House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Chairman:

     In your letter of November 23, 1981, you requested, among other
things, that the General Accounting Office provide you with an opinion
concerning the legality of a waiver under section 211(f) of the Clean Air
Act, 42 U.S.C. S 7545(f), (Supp. I, 1977) granted by the Environrental
Protection Agency (EPA) to Anafuel Uilimited (Anafuel). You asked that
we respond to six specific questions concerning various aspects of this
waiver.

     Flor the reasons discussed below, we find:

     (1) The action of the EPA Administrator in granting a waiver to
     Anafuel, notithstanding staff recomendations that the waiver re-
     quest be denied, was within the authority granted the Administrator
     by section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act.

     (2) The legislative history unequivocally surorts  e conclusion
     that the Administrator can grant a waiver condition)ly or
     unconditionally.

     (3) Referral of such ,.aiver reauests to the Office of Management and
     Budget for review would normialy be reuiired by Executive Order
     12291, February 17, 1981 (46 F.R. 13193, February 19, 1981), but not
     when the tiFe needed for review would cause a conflict with a statu-
     tory deadline for respcnding to the request.,

     (4) The extension of the statutorily required 180-day deadline for
     granting or denying a waiver request was not specifically authorized
     by the statute. However, granting the conditional waiver did not
     harm the party to be protected Dy tho deadline and resulted in the
     imrposition of requirements on Aafuei to provide specified environ-
     mrntal safeguards.

     (5) EPA's action in providing internal EPA memoranda to Anafuel
     could be interpreted as being within the &- bit of the preferential
     treatment prohibition in the agency's ethical standards. Eecause we
     cannot determine the nature and extent of information custcrarily
     disclosed orally by EPA to waiver appiicant-s, however, we are not in
     a position tc render an opinion on the propriety of EPA's actions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most