About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-204114 1 (1981-08-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkdp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL


B-204114


August 10, 1981


     Paul W. Ahrens, President
     Miracle Recreation Equipment Company
     P.O. Box 275
     Grinnell, Iowa  50112

     Dear Mr. Ahrens:

          We refer to your letter of July 10, 1981 regarding the
     late submission of your proposal on the General Services
     Administration's (GSA) request for proposals (RFP)
     No. 10 PN-HRS-0039 for the procurement of recreational
     equipment.

          As we understand it, the RFP specified that May 8,
     1981 at 3:30 p.m. was the time of closing. Due to an over-
     sight in your office, your proposal was not mailed until
     May 14, 1981 and was not received by GSA until May 18,
     1981 at 10:25 a.m., or 10 days after the specified closing
     date.

          Although your company has held a contract with GSA
     for many years, and even though you assumed that the bid
     closing was later in the summer, as it had been in 1980,
     GSA was correct in rejecting your proposal. The result
     may appear harsh in your particular case; however, the
     integrity of the competitive procurement system requires
     that the established rules be observed.

          The Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR) mandate that
     proposal received after the exact time specified in the RFP
     not be considered unless it falls under one of the several
     exceptions. FPR § 1-3.802-1 (b) (1964 ed.). Thus, by regu-
     lation, a late proposal may be considered only where the
     proposal is received prior to award and it was sent by reg-
     istered or certified mail 5 days before the date of closing,
     or the late receipt was due solely to the mishandling of
     the proposal by the Government after its receipt or it was
     the only proposal received. FPR S 1-3. 802-i (a) (1964 ed.).

          The general rule followed by our Office is that the
     offeror is charged with the responsibility of assuring that
     its proposal arrives at the proper place at the proper time.
     See Chambers Consultants and Planners, B-192465, August 18,
     1978, 78-2 CPD 134. Because your proposal admittedly did


ZAlicc'e-     . 1dt,0~0 *1 A c--.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most