About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202303 1 (1981-06-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkbk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                       COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                                 WASHINGTON D.C. 20548


B-202303                                               June 18, 1981



The Honorable Jack Brooks
Chairman, Committee on Government
  Operations
House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Chairman:

     This is in response to your request for our co.ents on H.R. 316
97th Cong., 1st Sess., which if enacted would be' cited as the Limitation
on Government Recordkeeping Requirements and Actions Act of 1981.

     On the basis of remarks made upon the introduction of similar bills
in the 96th Congress, it seems clear that the intent of this bill is to
protect individuals and businesses against untimely Government regulatory
enforcement with respect to their otherwise private business or personal
endeavors. Although the bill thus would not seem to be intended to apply
to those dealing directly with the Government by contract, grant, loan,
or other mechanism for transferring funds or benefits, as presently
drafted, it would have this effect. Among other things, our comments
address a number of undue burdens which the present bill language would
place on Government operations. Many of these burdens would be eliminated
by redefining person in section 2(b)(3) of the bill to exclude those
dealing directly with the Government.

     Section 2(a)(1) of the bill would preclude an agency from requiring,
or enforcing any law or regulation which requires, a person to maintain,
prepare or produce any record (other than a record relating to a dangerous
material), more than four years after the date of the transaction or event
which is the subject of the record.

     Section 2(a)(2) of the bill would preclude an agency from taking legal
action against any person:

     -for enforcement of a law or regulation, or

     -for collection of civil fine, penalty or forfeiture, more than
       four years after the date of the act or failure to act which
       is the subject of the action.

     These provisions in section 2 would not apply when the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954 or its implementing regulations provide otherwise.


                     RECORDKEEPING PROVISIONS

     The bill would provide a uniform four-year limit on the time that
any agency could require a person to retain records. While we believe
that reducing records retention requirements is a desirable goal, we do



                                  62133,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most