About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-200685 1 (1981-04-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkab0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
      04                                      /

V\jR
                   - COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                              WASHINGTON D.C. 20548


 B-200685
                                   April 13, 1981



 The Honorable Jack Brooks
 Chairman, Committee on Government Operations
 House of Representatives

 Dear Mr. Chairman:

      This responds to your letter, dated March 26, 1981, and the
 letter you attached from Congressman James R. Jones, Chairman of
 the House Committee on the Budget, concerning GAO's execution of
 ±14s responsibilities under ti-m Impoundment Control Act of 197
 Pub. L. No. 93-344, 31 U.S.C. 1400, et seq. The letters raise
 various procedural and legal issues concerning GAO's implemen-
 tation of the Act.7

 EXPLANATION OF GAO PROCEDURES UNDER THIS ACT

      Section 1012 and 1013 of Qthe Impoundment Control Act2 31
 U.S.C. 1402, 1403,{require the President to submit a special mes-
 sage to the Congress on any impoundments--rescissions or deferrals--
 he wishes to initiate. Section 1014 requires that a copy of that
 message be transmitted to the Comptroller General on the same day
 it is sent to the Congress. The Comptroller General is to assist
 the Congress by reviewing each message and issuing a report on his
 findings as promptly as practicableA

     CThe Office of General Counsel in GAO has arranged to receive
 a copy of the President's special message on the same day that it
 is transmitted to the Congress. Typically, on that same day, each
 proposed impoundment is assigned to the GAO division having audit
 responsibility for the program involved. GAO's auditors promptly
 contact agency budget and program officials to begin the process
 of verifying the information contained.in the special message.
 Within the time constraints involved in the process, independent
 audit data also may be developed. The findings and conclusions
 of our audit personnel are reported back to the Office of General
 Counsel as the examinations are concluded.7

     LAs the audit examinations are being conducted, the Office
 of General Counsel examines the legal implications of each impound-
 ment to determine if the proposal is in compliance with statutory
 authority.D The most common legal issue is whether the Executive
 has authority to withhold funds during Congress' consideration
 of an impoundment proposal. It arises usually in the context of a
 rescission proposal in which the Executive invokes section 1012(b)




                      6V3

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most