About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-195167 1 (1981-03-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjzc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
:                            WASHINGTON D.C. 20548



    B-195167                                      March 5, 1981




    The Honorable William F. Bolger
    Postmaster General
    United States Postal Service

    Dear Mr. Bolger:

         Further reference is made to your letter dated May 23,
    1980, requesting that we reconsider our decisions'in
    Matter of Postal Service Employees, 58 Comp. Gen7132 (1978),
    and Matter of James A. Schultz, 59 Comp. Gen. 28 (1979).

         LIn~those decisions, we held that an employee of the
    Postal Service who accepts an appointment to a new position
    with an executive agency is not eligible for reimbursement
    of relocation expenses-under 5 U.S.C. 5724 and 5724a. Essen-
    tially, we noted that 5 U.S.C. 104 and 2105, as amended by
    the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 (Act), Pub. L. 91-375,
    6(c)(2) and (4), 84 Stat. 775,,exclude the Postal Service
    from the definition of executive agency and direct that
    an employee of the Postal Service is not to be deemed an
    employee for purposes of title 5 of the United States
    Code except as otherwise expressly provided by law. We also
    noted that 5 U.S.C. 5721specifically precludes Postal Ser-
    vice employees from being-regarded as agency employees. for
    purposes of 5 U.S.C. 5724 and 5724a,  which govern the reim-
    bursement of the relocation expenses of transferred agency
    employees. We therefore had no alternative but to conclude
    that 5 U.S.C. 5724 and 5724a have no application to employees
    of the Postal Service.

         As you suggested, we have reconsidered our previous
    decisions in light of the arguments contained in the memo-
    randum enclosed with your letter of May 23, 1980. However,
    the fact remains that,!the Act specifically precludes the
    Postal Service from being considered an executive agency
    for the purposes of title 5, United States Code., Moreover,
    neither 39 U.S.C. 1006 nor any other provision of law
    expressly extends the coverage of 5 U.S.C. 5724 and 5724a
    to Postal Service employees; on the contrary, coverage is
    specifically a~nd plainly precluded by 5 U.S.C. 5721. There-
    fore, in light of the clear statutory language of the Act,
    we have no basis, in the absence of an amendment to the Act,
    to reverse or modify our previous decisions.





                                 ,,>#, ,,01,6     3 L

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most