About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202994 1 (1981-04-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjcr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




               COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                        WASHINGTON. DC. 20548

                                            IN REPLY
B-202994                                    REFER TO.
CED 1-155                      .April 24, 1981


The Honorable John D. Dingell
Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Chairman:

      In response to your-request, we are providing our
views on three bills dealing with passive restraints in
passenger automobiles4   H.R. 3151 introduced by Mr. Hillis
and others; H.R. 3231 introduced by Mr. Wirth; and H.R.
3184 introduced by Mr. Collins and Mr. Bliley. H.R. 3151
would apply any passive restraint standard to all cars at
the same time but not before September 1, 1983. H.R. 3237
would apply any passive restraint standard to mid-size and
small cars built by the five largest manufacturers on or
after September 1, 1983, and to large cars I year later.
It would not change requirements for other manufacturers.
On the other hand, H.R. 3184 would repeal the passive
restraint standard entirely.

      On April 6, 198i, the Secretary of Transportation
delayed the implementation of the first phase of the
passive restraint standard by 1 year and issued a notice
of proposed rulemaking to reevaluate passive restraint
requirements. The Secretary is considering three alter-
natives which are somewhat similar to the bills being
considered by the Committee. Under the first alternative,
the sequence of compliance would change so small cars would
be required to comply on September 1, 1982; mid-size cars
on September 1, 1983; and full-size cars on September 1,
1984. The second alternative would require all cars to
comply on March 1, 1983. Both alternatives would also
eliminate the passive restraint reauirements for the front-
center seating position. The third alternative would
rescind the automatic restraint requirements.

      The following table sets forth the proposed changes
 in relation to DOT's original mandate, DOT's latest
 change, and DOT's proposed alternatives for the standard.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most