About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203348 1 (1981-09-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjbi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



     z                UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
                                  D o  n o t  fll3.e  & . a -a

         B-203348                         September 9, 1981

         Mr. William J. Maraist
         Assistant Administrator for Regulations
         Office of Federal Procurement Policy
         Office of Management and Budget
         Executive Office of the President

         Dear Mr. Maraist:

              You requested our comments on a draft segment of
         the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) covering Part
         15 - Negotiation, Subpart 15.6 - Source Selection.

              The draft sets out at section 15.609(a) the factors
         which must be considered by the contracting officer in
         determining the competitive range. The proposed FAR pro-
         vision states the contracting officer shall consider
         price and other factors * * * while the current Defense
         Acquisition Regulation (DAR) at section 3-805.2 provides
         that competitive range shall be determined on the basis
         of price or cost and other factors.

              We assume that the FAR provision eliminated the word
         cost only to more accurately reflect the language of 10
         U.S.C. § 2304(g), which describes competitive range in terms
         of price and other factors considered, and not to eliminate
         proposed cost as a factor in determining competitive range.
         We believe that the word price as used in 10 U.S.C. § 2304(g)
         is intended to refer to both the price in a procurement leading
         to a fixed-price type contract and to the proposed cost estimate
         in a procurement leading to a cost-reimbursement type contract,
         and we consider both the proposed cost estimate and the proposed
         fixed price to be critical elements in a competitive range deter-
         mination. Thus, we would not agree with the proposed FAR pro-
         vision if the elimination of the word cost was intended to
         preclude the necessity for consideration of an offeror's cost
         estimate in competitive range determinations.

              We appreciate the opportunity to comment.

                                        Sincerely yours,




                                        Harry R. Van Cleve
                    /        I          Acting General Counsel

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most