About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

OGC-82-11 1 (1982-05-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabdgy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                 COMPTAOLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
j'                       WASHINGTON D.C. 20o4

                                  May 6, 1982
B-205 053


                                                       118446
To the President of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives

     On February 5, 1982, the President's eighth special message
for fiscal year 1982 was transmitted to the Congress pursuant to
the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The special message pro-
posed 22 rescissions of budget authority totalling $10,655 mil-
lion, 14 new deferrals totalling $2,334 million, and revisions
to seven previously reported deferrals which increase the amounts
deferred by $768 million. On February 19, 1982, the President
submitted his ninth special message for fiscal year 1982, report-
ing a $2 million reduction in the amount proposed for rescission
in rescission proposal R82-23 (Mine Safety and Health Administra-
tion). In his eleventh special message for fiscal year 1982,
dated April 23, 1982, the President reduced by $3.4 billion the
amount proposed for rescission in rescission proposal R82-21
(subsidized housing programs).

     The 45-day period during which the funds proposed for
rescission could be withheld pending congressional consideration
of a rescission bill ended on Friday, April 23, 1982, without
Congress having passed any such bill. The withheld funds were
released by OMB on Monday, April 26, 1982.

     In our report to Congress dated March 10, 1982, we explained
in detail our interpretation of section 1001(4) of the Impound-
ment Control Act, the so-called fourth disclaimer, which pro-
vides that the Act does not supersede any other provision of
law requiring the obligation or expenditure of budget authority.
Briefly stated, our analysis requires examination of the statu-
tory scheme involved for evidence of a congressional mandate to
spend the funds appropriated for the particular program. In
the following report, we identify the rescission proposals sub-
mitted in the eighth and ninth special messages which involve
mandatory spending programs under our analysis of section 1001(4).
In our view, the Impoundment Control Act does not authorize
impoundments of funds for these programs.

          FUNDS APPROPRIATED TO THE PRESIDENT

R82-4      International Development Assistance
          Functional Development Assistance Program
          Food and Nutrition
          Education & Human Resources
          11X1023
          11XI025
                                                   GAO/OGC-82-11

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most