About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

CED-82-26 1 (1981-12-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabctb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                    UNITED STATES GENERAL ACcOUNT!NG CFFICE
         \ '/-2             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548

                                      December 17, 1981
COMMUN ITY ANO ECONOMIC
DELVZLOPMNT DIVISION
    B-205850II I I HI


    The Honorable Steny H. Hoyer                          117100
    House of Representatives

    Dear Mr. Hoyer:

         Subject: Proposed Relocation/Consolidation of the Soil
                   Conservation Service's Cartographic, Employee
                   Development, and Information Staffs at Fort Worth,
                   Texas (CED-82-26)

         This report is in response to your July 15, 1981, letter
    asking us to review the Department of Agriculture's proposed
    relocation of certain Soil Conservation Service functions from
    Lanham, Maryland, to Fort Worth, Texas, as well as alternatives
    to the move. The relocation is part of a proposed overall Serv-
    ice reorganization, consolidation, and employee reduction plan
    dated October 19, 1981, which also would affect several Service
    offices in Washington, D.C.; Nebraska; Oregon; and Pennsylvania.

         We reviewed the Service's October 19, 1981, proposal and
    examined the backup material provided us in support of the
    planned consolidation and relocation of its cartographic, em-
    ployee development, and information staffs to Fort Worth. We
    interviewed Service and General Services Administration officials
    in Nebraska, Texas, and Washington, D.C. Also, we requested the
    Service to make an analysis showing the results of consolidation
    without relocation.

         As a result of our review, we have-concluded th t neither
    the Service's October 19 proposal nor its supporting data pro-
    vides an adequate basis for judging the merits of the proposed
    move to Fort Worth. Without concluding whether such a move can
    ultimately be justified, we believe that the October 19 proposal
    is sufficiently flawed to render it inadequate as a basis for
    decision.

         We expressed our concerns orally to the Department's Office
    of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and to it's Director
    of Personnel and followed this up with a letter to the Director
    on December 10, 1981. A copy of that letter, and some of the
    material provided with it containing a more detailed discussion
    of the types of questions and concerns we have, is enclosed. In
    general terms, our questions and concerns have to do with:


                                                          (021990)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most