About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HRD-81-91 1 (1981-06-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabclg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                      0 Fcvo '7--47r77Ds, % .pe wde Mae Senor.;alC
                      A,:-Yi      u           o1 s&cIl c approval

                    UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


HUMAN RESOURCES
   DIVISION

     B-203367                                            JUNE 2,1981

     The Honorable Max Baucus
     United States Senate

     Dear Senator Baucus:

          Subject: Social Security Administration Policies for
                   Managing Its Administrative Law Judges
                   (HRD-81-91)

          On April 3, 1980, you requested that we review several issues
     concerning whether the Social Security Administration's (SSA's)
     Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are required to hear a certain
     number of cases a year or are limited in the number of reversals
     they can make. You also requested that we assess the impact on
     an ALJ's ability to conduct fair and proper hearings if SSA has
     such policies regarding production and reversal rates.

     BACKGROUND

          The Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) 1/ administers the
     hearings and appeals process within SSA. Social Security claim-
     ants who are not satisfied with SSA decisions can present their
     case before one of OHA's 700 ALJs. An ALJ reviews and decides
     the case based on the merits of the claim and applicable Social
     Security laws and regulations. If a claimant is not satisfied
     with an ALJ's decision, he or she can request a review by OHA's
     Appeals Council and finally by a U.S. district court.

          SSA's hearings and appeals process conforms to the principles
     of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). APA specifies certain
     procedural elements for a hearing which must be present to meet
     due process requirements. These include adequate notice, access
     to evidence, right to cross examination, right to counsel, and
     written findings and reasons for the decision. APA also requires
     that the person taking the evidence and rendering the decision be
     impartial and not have been involved in the case previously as an
     agency staff person. Finally, APA ensures the independence of the
     ALJs from the agency in which they operate by assigning responsi-
     bility for determining their qualifications, compensation, and
     tenure to the Office of Personnel Management.


     l/Formerly the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals.

                                                              (105117)




                                  6-7       3

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most