About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HRD-81-132 1 (1981-07-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabcga0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                     UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
 K. ,   -:                   WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


HUMAN RESOURCES                      July 31, 1981
   DIVISION


   The Honorable Albert Angrisani
   Assistant Secretary for Employment
      and Training
    Employment and Training Administration
    U.S. Department of Labor
                                                           115943
    Dear Mr. Angrisani.:

          Subject.: mproper Payments of Basic Hourly
                    Allowances to CETA Participants/
                    (HRD-81-132)

          During our current review of Labor and prime sponsor manage-
    ment of CETA funds (Code 205018), we found that four of the eight
    prime sponsors we visited were paying training participants a
    basic hourly allowance instead of a weekly incentive allowance
    as required by Labor's regulations. Because the hourly allowance
    payments were considerably more than the weekly incentive allow-
    ance, a significant amount of CETA funds was spent inappropriately.
    We are bringing this matter to your attention because the apparent
    cause of the problem is the improper interpretation of Labor's
    regulations. Furthermore, because of the decentralized nature
    of the CETA program, similar conditions may exist elsewhere. Our
    findings and recommendations to you are discussed in more detail
    in the following paragraphs.

          Labor's rules and regulations (20 C.F.R. part 676) provide
     for the payment of basic hourly allowances to CETA participants
     for time spent in classroom training. An exception to this pro-
     vision is that a $30 per week incentive allowance, in lieu of a
     basic hourly allowance, should be paid to participants who are
     receiving public assistance, or whose needs or income are taken
     into account in determining public assistance payments to others.
     Elsewhere, the regulations (20 C.F.R. part 675) define public
     assistance as Federal, State, or local government cash payments
     for which eligibility is determined by a need or income test.

          We examined payments by Philadelphia's Office of Employment
     and Training and found that during fiscal years 1980 and 1981 it
     paid a number of CETA participants basic hourly allowances ($2.30
     and $3.35 per hour during fiscal years 1980 and 1981, respec-
     tively) for time spent in classroom training, even though the
     participants were also receiving general assistance payments
     from the State of Pennsylvania. We brought this matter to the
     attention of your Region III office in April 1981. The region
     subsequently confirmed our finding and instructed the prime

                                                           (205018)


r-, / 7 7/a'

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most