About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GGD-81-33 1 (1980-12-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabbix0001 and id is 1 raw text is: d   4


                                                         /Iqool~

                  UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546

GM4RAL GOMMIr
    0iViION
    B-171019                                 DECEMBER 22, 1980




    The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy
    Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary
    United States Senate                           114008

    Dear Mr. Chairman:

          Subject: 'State Exclusionary Rule Procedures-
                   (GGD-81-33)

          You requested us to develop empirical data on the impact
     of the exclusionary rule on State criminal prosecutions sim-
     ilar to a previous study we performed at your request on the
     effect of the rule on Federal criminal trials. This prior
     effort resulted in the issuance of a report to you on
     April 19, 1979, entitled Impact of the Exclusionary Rule on
     Federal Criminal Prosecutions (GGD-79-19).

          In response to your office's request, we sent letters to
     the Attorneys General and Chief Justices of the 50 States re-
     questing data on each State's exclusionary rule requirements.
     Thirty-six of the 50 States responded to our inquiry and a
     summary of their responses is contained in the enclosures.

          Enclosure I summarizes the responses received from the
     States to specific questions asked concerning their exclu-
     sionary rule requirements. Enclosure II provides a summary
     by State. An analysis of the responses showed that there is
     a wide disparity among the States concerning their exclusion-
     ary rule requirements. As a result, we determined that a
     study similar to our study on the Federal system would be
     difficult if not impossible. After presenting the results
     of our analysis to your office, it was agreed that those
     States with a rule similar to the Federal rule would be con-
     tacted to inquire whether they would be willing to participate
     in a detailed study.

          We sent letters to four State Attorneys General (Alabama,
     Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin) and followed up these
     letters with discussions to determine the feasibility of con-
     ducting a detailed study in each State. The consensus of the

                                                          (990515)
                        6,376,7



    :.: J ' r s <    {,<;4 , - -+: : ':    - i. . .

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most