About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

PSAD-80-45 1 (1980-04-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabaoy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
RLEA           STRICTE - Not to be released outs;o the General
            Accounting Office except on the b's of specific approval
            by the Office of Congressional Relations.

                    COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D-C. Z0540



     B- 1 9 3 50 2                                 APRIL 29, 1980



     The 3onorable Jack Brooks
     Chairman, Subcommittee on Legislation
       and National Security
     Committee on Government Operations                   112382
     House of Representatives

     Dear Mr. Chairman:

          Subject: rllegations of Army Retaliation Against Bristol
                     Electronics, Inc., New Bedford, Massachusetts,
                     As a Result of Earlier Committee Inquiries
                     (PSAD-80-45)

          In response to your November 15, 1979, request, we
     investigated allegations by N4r. Stanley A. Revzin, President,
     Bristol Electronics, Inc., tnat were set forth in his Novem-
     ber 1, 1979, letter to you. (See enc. V.) We also con-
     sidered the information in Mr. Revzin's February 27, 1980,
     letter to you, concerning essentially the same allegations.

           In our investigation we found no documentary evidence
     supporting Mr. Revzin's allegations, and all indications are
     that the Army treated Bristol fairly. Bristol's difficulties
     appear to be the result of its decision to accept the risk
     inherent in bidding a fixed-price contract at an unrealistic-
     ally low price, expecting to offset losses against other
     business. Details supporting our conclusions are set forth
     in enclosure I.

          The scope of our work was designed to cover your primary
     concern that a contractor may have suffered retaliation as a
     result of its cooperation and testimony oefore your committee.
     During the course of our investigation, we informally kept
     your office advised of developments as tney occurred. ,ve
     interviewed Mr. Revzin to clarify his allegations, and we
     reviewed the record of hearings referenced in his letter.
     We visited the U.S. Army Communications and Electronics
     Materiel Readiness Command, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, to
     review contract files and other records pertinent to the
     allegations and to interview those having direct knowledge
     of these issues. We visited the Defense Contract Adminis-
     tration Services, Management Area, Boston, Massachusetts,
                                                           (950574)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most