About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

CED-79-71a 1 (1979-03-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaazzq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                  COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON 0 C 20545
  3                in i     iMarch 31, 1979




                      111007


    The Honorable Morris K. Udall     7
    Chairman, Committee on Interior  )/,
      and Insular Affairs            VR                          -
    House of Representatives

    Dear Mr. Chairman:

         By lett  dated February 26, 1979, you requested that we
    review the istoric preservati n program of the Pennsylvania
    Avenue Deve opment Corporationj(PADC), focusing on the pro-A/
    posed demolition of Kann's Department Store as a case in
    point. You asked that we determine whether applicable laws,
    regulations, and procedures had been followed and whether
    PADC had fully compared the cost of demolition to the costs
    of other alternatives, including long-term adaptive re-use.
    On March 26, 1979, we briefed your Committee, the Subcommittee
    on Public Lands, and the Subcommittee on National Parks and
    Insular Affairs on the results of our work. We were requested
    to provide this letter, which summarizes the information
    presented at that briefing, together with a chronology of
    certain events relating to the proposed demolition of Kann's
    Department Store.

        Our review disclosed that PADC has complied with
    applicable laws, regulations, and procedures in its actions
    regarding Kann's Department Store.

        With regard to the cost comparison question, the Penn-
    sylvania Avenue Plan of 1974, which was approved by Congress
    on May 19, 1975, provides for a four-block superblock
    multi-use housing complex which will require the demolition
    of Kann's. Kann's occupies less than one-fourth of this
    four-block area. PADC is obligated to carry out the approved
    development plan pursuant to its enabling legislation
2   (P.L. 92-578, Section 5(e)). While it is within PADC's
' discretionary authority to consider alternatives to the plan
   at any time, such as the Ridley proposal, by which the Kann
-buildings would be renovated and adapted to housing, any sub-
   stantive changes would be required to undergo the same review
and approval process as the 1974 plan.     PADC considered but



                                            CED-79-71 a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most