About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

CED-79-98 1 (1979-06-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaazjq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



    MUNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548



COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION                            IIIIIII I I I II II l

     B-148736                                       LM09668

     The Honorable Cecil D. Andrus
     The Secretary of the Interior
                                                        109668
     Dear Mr. Secretary:

          We have completed ourfGeview of the National Park
     Service's urban national rec7eation area program 7 We
     directed our review primarily toward -the first t-nree areas
     to be designated by the Congress. These are Golden Gate-i-i
     near San Francisco, California; Gateway -in the harb~r-_ea
     of New York City, New York; and Cuyahoga Valley, near
     Cleveland and Akron, Ohio. We made the review to assess      41Q
     whether the program was meeting its objectives of providing
     recreational needs of urban populations and protecting and
     preserving significant natural and scenic settings near
     large cities.

          In summary, the three areas we reviewed were providing
     recreation for many urban residents. Also, the natural and
     scenic settings of the areas were being protected and pre-
     served. However, low-income, inner-city residents were not
     using the areas very often, and Federal costs could increase
     considerably if all the lands within the recreation areas
     that are now owned and protected by State and local govern-
     ments were to be donated to the Secretary. These matters
     are discussed in more detail in the following sections.

          At each of the three areas, we examined the recreation
     and preservation efforts and goals. At the Park Service's
     Washington, D.C., headquarters and its North Atlantic and
     Western regional offices, we evaluated the Service's plans,
     policies, procedures, and practices relating to urban
     national recreation areas. We also reviewed various data
     and studies; interviewed State and city recreation officials
     and representatives of community groups about the recreation
     needs of five inner-city neighborhoods in San Francisco,
     Oakland, and New York City; and obtained information from
     Interior's Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service,
     the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Army Corps of
     Engineers. We discussed this report with National Park
     Service officials, who generally agreed with the matters
     included herein.

                                                         CED-79-98
                                                         (148570)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most