About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LCD-78-120 1 (1978-07-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaaxph0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 










                           DCCUNfENT BESUNE     /§J9     (C-1C Da k,
 06524 - fB2087101 1 (Restricted)                   Y- 7- ?8

 Government Field Offices Should Better Implement the Freedom of
 Infcrmation Act. LCD-78-120; B-173761. July 25, 1978. 47 pp.

 Report to Rep. Richardson Preyer, Chairman, Hcuse Ccmuittee on
 Government Operations: Government Infoation and Individual
 Riqhts Subcommittee; by Elmer B. Staats, Ccmptxcller General.

 Issue Area: Federal Information: l;lementing the 'rivacl Act of
    11974 (1401).
 Contact: Logistics and CommunicaticnE £iv.
 Budget Function: General Government: General Exoperty and
     Records Manaqement (804).
 Organizatica Concerned: Department of Agriculture; Eepartmeit uf
     Defense: Department of Energy; Department of Health,
     Education, and Welfare; Department of L:%using and Uricn
     Development; Department of Justice; De;artment of
     Transportation: Department of StatE; Securities and Excha--ge
     Commission; Federal Trade Commissice.
 Conqressional Relevance; House Committee cn Government
     Operations: Government Informaticn and Individual Rights
     Sutcormittee.-Rep. Richardson Pre er.
 Authority: Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Privacy
     Act of 1974. 31 U.S.C. 484. H. HBet. 8S-1497. E. Rept.
     89-813.

          The Freedom cf Information Act provides the basic
 iuthoriry and procedure for the public to ottain documents and
 records from the Federal Goverrnent. Findirgs/Conclusions: The
 act has given citizens access to records not previously
 available. Although it is being used mostly by tusinesses aLbd
 law firms for purposes not ccntem;lated by the Congress, ay
 attempt to requlate such use could also restrict use by the
 public. Most agencies are making a reasonatle effort tc meet the
 act's time requirements for responding to requests, but a few
 aqencizs have not responded within the 10-day time limit.
 Agencies should evaluate each step of thE process ard ccrsider
 estahlishinq time limits for each ste;. Agencies are not abusing
 fae provisions of the act. Cn the contrary, there is a
 reluctance to assess fees, and clarificaticr is needed in this
 area. One proDlem area is in applying oxenticns frc disclosure
 Iistec in the act. Agencies differed ii denials of requests and
 ,n determinniq what constituted a denial. Additional training on
 :ne act is needed in scme agency field cffices with variations
 amonq agencies i. amount and type cf trainirg needed.
 improvement i3 also needed in support ky acency sacageaert of
 Proqrams for providing purlic access t¢ Gcvernment records and
 :n tn qua--ty or agency reports on implementation cf the act.
 Recommendatiuns: The Attorney General shculd have the heads of
 Federal d-v-nrlmerts and agencies: review regulations pertaining
 to the dc- to make sure that they are clear, ccnfors tc the
6pirit af the act, and dc not contair unwarranted restrictive

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most