About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

CED-78-52 1 (1978-01-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaaxgb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                 COMPTRO! I ER GENERAL OF THE UNIT-O STATES
                           WASHINI.TON. D.C. Z0148



 B-I 6-506
                                                      JAIV   j.i,


 The Honorable Leo J. Ryan
 Chairman, Environment, Energy,
   and Natural Resources Subcommittee
 Committee on Government Operations
 House of Representatives

 Dear Mr. Chairman:

      As requested in your October 12, 1977, letter we have analyzed the
 Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) final monitoring report on Concorde
 operations at Du!les A.irport, the National Academy of Sciences' report on
 the determ.nation of public reaction to Concorde operations, and FAA's
 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which would establish noise limits for
 supersonic aircraft. These documents were not available for analysis
 in our report issued to you on September 15, 1977, entitled The
 Concorde--Results of a Supersonic Aircraft's Entry Into the United
 States, CED-77-131.

      Based on our analysis of the FAA proposed rulemaking, we are recom-
 mending that the Secretary, Department of Transportation (DOT), prior to
 is.suing a-.final. noise rule,.make.tuo important.ch-anges.-The. eloda. opt-ior&'
 provisions--the right of the local airport proprietor to regulate noise
,.aa-. its o-wt, airpbrt --may;, i fr£act; not -be -a vi-able methOd.* for r~ulat'
Concorde noise.   We are recommending that more clearly defined guidance
be given to airport proprietors so that they can invoke their local option
(if they desire) without encountering long legal battles. In addition,
the proposed rule does not establish noise standards for new design super-
sonic aircraft. Rather than developing noise standards for use in design-
ing-new supersonics .-the-proposed rule would allow standards to be
developed based on noise-reduction technology as it becomes available.
It appears tousx thittheFederal government should provide some criteria
-to-idustry-a irtutoise v1*els-that would be acceptable for future
aircraft--rather'-thaun4,t*-t  et--hidevelopment of future technology control
othe  iet~eeveniL bestablshed. oiTherefore, we are also recom-
        me~ibame - ousehiev~~e1.|I, -require new design supersonic aircraft


                       - Oei6t -FAA'ionsin FM's final monitoring report is
 that based on       ift.-copinion survey, Concorde has gained in acceptance
 duringthe. tr; iar eriod..We-found no valid basis for such a statement.
__1_       ; 1ou  C o-  raiA   Werious-questions about the validity of the
public-opii uusoes the National Academy of Sciences' report.
ven  Surveys was questionable, the number

                                                           CED-78-5:
                                                           (06703)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most