About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GGD-78-5 1 (1978-03-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaawts0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

DOCIBRNT fRSBI


05147 - fD07356521
Customs Penalty Assessment and liti.gation Proceduies: Chages
Mould Help Both the Govecnoent and Importe-:s. GGD 78-5;
B-114898. march 13. 1976. 28 pp. * 4 appe'dices (6 pp.).
Report to the Congress; by Elmer B. Staats Comptroller General,

Issue Area: Law Enf 0rce0Rn' and Crime Prevention (500).
Contact: General %ove m*aent Div.
Budqet Function: General Government: Other General Goveraneut
     (751); Xav Enforcemeat and Justice: Federal Law Enforcement
     and Prosecutlon (806).
 0:ganization Co cernedf: D#pWitment of the 2reasuryr; United
     States Customs Snvice.
 Congressional Relevance: Congress; House Committee on says an d
     means; 54a.uto Committee on Financa: Intrnatioaal Trade
     Subcommitt e.
 Authority: -19 C.F.F. 10. -19 C.F.R. 113. -19 C.F.Ai- 141. a19
     C.F.R. 14.. -19 C.F.R. 18. Tariff Act of 1930# as amended.
     19 U.S.C. l,53. 19 U.S.c. 1584. 19 U.S.C. 1592.

          In recent years, .S. inpoLters have alleged that
 penalties for violating import las and regulations are
 ineqgaitable and do not provide for adequate judicial review, an
 examination of penalty ,assessaent and vitigation procedures in
 five U.S. Customs Service districts showed that the lava#
 regulations, and procedures for handling import violations have
 not been in the best interest of the Govenent or the
 .porters. Findinqsfozclusiona: The Custoa  Service's penalty
 asesmseut and mitigation pzedures contain four aajo     problem
 areas: the intial penalty require4 by law is often unfdir.
 judicial review of violations has boe  limited to cousidering
 whether a violation occurred, Custons does not uniformly apply
 the mitigation process, and Customs takes ccnsiderable time to
 process peualty cases wkich slows receipt of revenue by the
 Gavernrent. In fiscal year 1975. the Government collected
 penalties of about $15.6 million. Nith timely pre-easing of
 penalty cases it could have received the revenues ere
 promptly. Recommendations: shore possible, the Sewretary of ths
 Treasury should revise Customs regulations to allow Customs to
 consider the circumstpuces of the violation when asse.sinq a
 penalty. The Commissiuner of Customs shoald: giv.e ex ,licit
 Service-wide guidelines for all types of violations, require the
 districts to submit exceptions to the guidelimnes to
 headquarteraI, and place greater emphasis on expediting penalty
 cases. The Commissioner should emphasize quicker processing of
 penalty cases by: identifying why delals in investigations
 occurr; 2-nplementing procedures, including priorities and time
 frames, to speed up investigations whenever possible;
 iorlementing a reporting system to identify exceptional
 investigations which take longer than the time frames;
clacifyinq Customss policy of granting extensions fo-: filing

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most