About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

FPCD-77-54 1 (1978-02-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaawpd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



DOCUMIENT RESUME


04860 - rB03452z0]

Problems with Federal Ejual Employment Opportunity Guidelines on
Employee Selection PqedAures Need To Be Resolved. FPCD-77-54;
8-167015. February 2, '78. 38 pp. + 10 appendices (28 pp.).

Report to the Congress; 'by Elmer B. Staats, Couptroller Genoral.

Issue Area: Personne  &1ngement and Compensation 1300);
     Non-Discriniaation &nd Equal Opportunity Pr=g&ams: Federal
     Agencies' Achievement of Equal Gppcr';nity and
     Nondiscrimination. Obiectives (1010).
 Contact: Federal Personnel and Compensation Div.
 Budget Function: Genlr'a4 Government: Central Personnel
     Managemert (805) L, eneral Government: Other General
     Government (806). -
Organization Concerned: Civil Service Commission; Department of
     Labor; Department of Justice; Equal EmploymeLt Opportunity
     Commission.
Congressional Relevand'de House Committee on Education and Labor;
    Senate Committee' or Human Resources; Congress.
At1thority: Equal Emp16yent Opportunity Act of 1972 (P.L.
     92-261). Civil Rjqgts Act of 1974. Executive orier 11246.
     Griggs v. Duke Po~er Co., 401 U.S. 424 (I571). Ailbermarle
     Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.C. 405, 425 (1975). McDozinell
     Douglas Corp. v.G'reen, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973). Washington
     v. Davis, 429 U.S. 229 (1976). Douglas v. Hampton, 512 F.2d
     976 (D.C. CiL. 1415).

         The Equal Employment OpportuAity Coordinating Council,
consisting of the Secretary of Labor, the Attorney General, and
the Chairpersons of the Civil Service Commissicn, Civil Eights
commission, and Equal Employment Cpportunity Commission cr their
respective delegates, was established in 1972 to cocrdinate
Federal egudl employment opportunity enforcement efforts. Early
in 1973, the Council set out to develop and adopt uniform
guidelines for determining the proper use of tests and other
selection procedures, onsist:?nt with the equal employment
opportunity requirehts of Federal law. After 5 years. this
work is still not copleted. Findings/Conclusiou : Longstanding
disagreements on gukeltne requirements have arisen among the
%ember agencies of the Council. Their vieus have differed on the
legal and technical standards for judging the proper use of
tests, and they per~cPve their mandates differently and have
pursued different op.j ting responsihb±ities. The Coun:il lacks
authority to compel 'eiber agencies to change their policies and
ouidelines or to adot ,ned ones in the interest of developing
unitorm positions on .matters relating to equal employment
opportunity. Other  portant unresolved issues include.:
eliminating misunderstandings about what the Federal guidelines
require employers to .o, obtaiving financial and professional
resources to put the ..idelines into practice, getting
consistent agency ir,,igpretation and ehforcenent of uniform

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most