HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobaavkz0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
DOCUMENT RESUME
00108 - [A07511691 ,Restricted)
[Allegations of Recruiter Malpractice in the marine Corps].
PPCD-77-22; 5-157371. February 2, 1977. 2 pp. + appendices (8
pp.).
Report to Rep. Richard C. White, Chairman, House Committee on
Armed Services: Military Personnel Subcommittee; by Bluer B.
Staats, Comptroller General.
Issue Area: Personnel Management and Compensation (300);
PersoLnel anagement and Compensation: All Vclunteer Force
Needs (303).
Contact: Federal Personnel and Compensation Div.
Du63et Function: National Defense: Department of Defense -
Military (except procurement & contracts) (051).
Organization Concerned: Department of the Navy; Cepartent of
Defence; marine Corps.
Congressional Relevanc-: House Committee on armed Services:
military Personnel Subcommittee.
Marine Corps recruiting efforts in the Detroit,
Michigan* and Tulsa, Oklahoma, areas were reviewed following
allegations by tvo former recruiters of widespread recruiting
malpractices in those areas. The review included: investigationa
of recruiting stations; reviews of recruiting policies,
procedures, and practices; examination of records, reports, and
correspondence; and interviews with present and former
recruiters. Allegations of malpractice invol..i enlistment of
unqualified applicants by trading them for cther unqualified
applicants in nearby states, schooling them to lie, and running
fake police checks. Findings/Conclusions: These allegations
could not be verified at the recruiting stations visited, and
review of the records generally did not 8up~ort these
contentions. At Tulsa, there were irregularities in the
enlistment of one individual, and in Detroit, twc individuals
were rejected for physical reasons. ight out of 109 recruiters
in Detroit and two out of 43 recruiters in the Oklahose City
Recruiting Station were disciplined for recruiting malpractices
.r irregularities during the past 2 years. (RRS)](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobaavkz0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)