About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

GAO-03-744R 1 (2003-06-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaamfr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: A Aco untability * Integrity * Reliability United States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20548 June 18, 2003 The Honorable Harry Reid Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Subject: Trends in Federal and State Capital Investment in Highways Amid projections that freight traffic will increase 65 percent by 2020 and that traffic congestion will worsen, many transportation officials are concerned about the challenge of maintaining and improving the condition and performance of the nation's highway infrastructure. In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) increased funding for highways by 27 percent in real terms over the previous surface transportation authorization act--the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA).' Nevertheless, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) estimates that the nation will need to spend about $76 billion-or 18 percent more than it spent in 2000-each year through 2020 to maintain the average conditions and performance of the nation's highways and bridges, and about $107 billion or 65 percent more than it spent in 2000 to efficiently improve the highway system.2 These projections raise concerns because both the federal government and state governments are facing budget deficits in the years ahead, totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. As you prepare to reauthorize TEA-21 and establish funding levels for the next several years, you asked us to provide historical information on the nation's investment in its highway infrastructure. In particular, you asked that we (1) identify overall trends in the nation's capital investment in its highway system over the past 20 years, particularly since the enactment of TEA-21 in 1998-and compare the trends in federal spending with the trends in state and local government spending; (2) determine how these trends in highway capital investment compare with the fiscal capacity of both the nation and individual states to fund these programs, particularly 1Based on a comparison of authorization levels for Title 1 programs in ISTEA and TEA-21 shown in FHWA's Financing Federal-Aid Highways. We adjusted the authorizations to 2001 dollars using gross domestic product (GDP) deflators. 'FHWA projections are based in 2000 dollars. GAO-03-744R Trends in Federal and State Highway Investment Page 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most