About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-01-51R 1 (2000-11-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaalrj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





      Accountability  Integrity* Reliability
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548


   November 30, 2000

   The Honorable Jeff Sessions
   United States Senate

   Subject: Consequences of the Ruling by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Forest
           Management Projects

   Dear Senator Sessions:


   In February 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit (the appeals
   court); which consists of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia; reversed a January 30, 1998,
   district court decision on the Forest Service's management of timber-cutting projects in
   the Chattahoochee National Forest. The Sierra Club challenged the Forest Service's
   approval of eight timber sale projects in this forest and alleged that the Forest Service
   lacked the required inventory or population data on (1) the proposed, endangered,
   threatened, or sensitive species of plants and animals and (2) the management indicator
   species (selected representative species used to estimate the effects of forest plans on
   forest ecosystems) required by the Chattahoochee-Oconee Forest Plan and the Forest
   Service's own regulations. The appeals court held that the Forest Service's approval of
   these projects was arbitrary and capricious because the agency lacked the required
   inventory or population data.


   Originally, we underto o k this work at the request o f the late Senator Paul D. Coverdell.
   You requested that we continue this work. As agreed with your office, this report
   addresses (1) the number of the Forest Service's timber sales and vegetative
   management projects (such as trail construction work and prescribed burning)
   suspended as a result of the appeals court's decision and (2) the types of financial,
   economic, environmental, and other consequences that the Forest Service and other
   stakeholders have attributed to the appeals court's decision. As agreed, we obtained
   data describing the suspended projects and the related consequences when available.
   When data were unavailable, we obtained the opinions of Forest Service officials and
   other stakeholders, including environmental, community, and recreational groups, about
   the potential consequences. When possible, we provide quantitative information on the
   consequences attributed to the appeals court's decision.


   Results in Brief

   The decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit resulted in the
   Forest Service's suspending or maintaining the suspension of 49 projects within


GAO-01-51R Forest Management Projects

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most