About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

RCED-00-150R 1 (2000-06-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaaloz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I
 GAO

        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office                         Resources, Community, and
Washington, DC 20548                                        Economic Development Division

         B-285279


         June 6, 2000

         The Honorable Harold E. Ford, Jr.
         House of Representatives
         Subject: The Status of Major HUD Funding Awarded to the Memphis Housing

                  Authority

         Dear Mr. Ford:

         The Memphis Housing Authority (MHA), like other housing authorities around the
         country, annually enters into a contract with the Department of Housing and Urban
         Development (HUD) through which HUD agrees to provide funding for MHA to
         provide low-income persons with housing that is decent, safe, and sanitary-MHA's
         primary mission. MHA, in turn, agrees to manage the housing in accordance with the
         contract's provisions. In January 1997, HUD's Office of the Inspector General (OIG)
         recommended that HUD declare MHA in violation of its contract with HUD because
         the housing authority was not fulfilling its primary mission. The OIG stated that MHA
         was not fulfilling this mission because its buildings, grounds, and individual dwelling
         units are in extremely poor condition because of age and because MHA had not
         effectively maintained or modernized its developments.1

         HUD declined the OIG's recommendation to declare MHA in violation of its contract,
         instead choosing in early 1998 to enter into a performance agreement with MHA. The
         agreement, which took effect in July 1998, set broad goals for the authority, including
         time lines and specific benchmarks for improving the overall operation of the
         authority as well as for addressing the problems that the OIG identified. However,
         because of significant turnover among the authority's top management, MHA made
         little progress toward meeting the terms of the agreement. In February 1999, MHA
         hired a new executive director; shortly thereafter, the new executive director
         initiated discussions with HUD to renegotiate the terms of the agreement to better
         reflect his plans for improving MHA's performance. In April 2000, HUD and MHA
         entered into a binding memorandum of agreement replacing the March 1998
         performance agreement.


         'See Memphis Housing Authority, Memphis, Tennessee, HUD District Inspector General
         Southeast/Caribbean District (97-AT-201-1001, Jan. 13, 1997).


GAO/RCED-00-150R Status of HUD Funds Drawn Down by MHA

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most