About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

HEHS-00-189R 1 (2000-08-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaalle0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




   ~G A 0
        Accountabiity I Integry * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office                               Health, Education, and
Washington, DC 20548                                                 Human Services Division


         B-286131



         August 24, 2000

         The Honorable Tom A. Coburn
         Vice Chair
         Subcommittee on Health and Environment
         Committee on Commerce
         House of Representatives

         Subject: Ryan White CARE Act: Title I Funding for San Francisco

         Dear Mr. Coburn:

         This letter responds to your request for additional information regarding funding for
         San Francisco under the Ryan White CARE Act. Specifically, you asked that we
         compare San Francisco's fiscal year 2000 title I grant award, which was determined
         using the act's hold-harmless provision,' with what the award would have been had
         deceased AIDS cases been included in the calculation. You also asked how funding
         for San Francisco that was based on the inclusion of deceased AIDS cases would
         have compared with the amount San Francisco would have received if the fiscal year
                                                               2
         2000 hold-harmless level had been reduced by 25 percent.

         In brief, San Francisco's fiscal year 2000 title I grant award would have been 26
         percent less had both living and deceased AIDS cases been used to calculate the
         award instead of the current hold-harmless provision. The reason for this result is
         the substantial decline in newly reported AIDS cases in San Francisco compared with
         other eligible metropolitan areas (EMA). Therefore, a 25-percent reduction in the
         current hold-harmless level would have provided San Francisco with funding
         comparable to what it would have received if title I grants had been calculated on the
         basis of both deceased and living cases.



         1The hold-harmless provision limits the amount that the funding of an eligible metropolitan area may
         decline from its fiscal year 1995 level. From fiscal year 1996 through fiscal year 2000, eligible
         metropolitan areas were guaranteed that their funding would not decline more than 5 percent below
         their fiscal year 1995 level.
         2Under H.R. 4807, The Ryan White CARE Act Reauthorization Act for 2000, the hold-harmless level
         would be reduced by 25 percent over 5 years.


GAO/HEHS-00-189R Ryan White CARE Act

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most