About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-16-592R 1 (2016-07-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaakcd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20548



July 27, 2016


Congressional Committees

Defense Space Acquisitions: Too Early to Determine If Recent Changes Will Resolve
Persistent Fragmentation in Management and Oversight

The Department of Defense (DOD) relies on space systems to provide critical capabilities that
support military and other government operations, including but not limited to communications;
missile warning; positioning, navigation, and timing; and intelligence information. The Air Force,
specifically, the Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC), develops and acquires most military
space systems, and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) develops Intelligence
Community (IC) space systems. These systems can be very challenging to develop and
expensive to acquire and field.

We and others have reported for over two decades that fragmentation and overlap in DOD
space acquisition management and oversight have contributed to program delays and
cancellations, cost increases, and inefficient operations. For example, in 2012 we found that
fragmented leadership contributed to a 10-year gap between the delivery of GPS satellites and
user equipment. We also found that a lack of a government-wide authority hindered space
situational awareness acquisition efforts.1 Similarly, last year, we testified that DOD continues to
face challenges in aligning the delivery of space system segments, in part, because budgeting
authority for the segments is spread across the military services. DOD lacks a single authority to
ensure alignment of these segments.2 DOD has noted that space is becoming an increasingly
contested domain, resulting in greater threats to deployed military forces. The ability to
effectively respond to these threats has increased the importance of focused leadership in
national security space.

In Senate Report 114-49 accompanying S.1376, a bill for the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2016, the Senate Armed Services Committee included a provision for GAO
to review the effectiveness of the current DOD space acquisition and oversight model and to
evaluate what changes, if any, could be considered to improve the governance of space system
acquisitions and operations. This report formally transmits information we provided in a briefing
to the committee on May 17, 2016, to meet our reporting requirement (see enclosure I: DOD
Space Acquisition Management and Oversight, Information Presented to Congressional
Committees). This report addresses the following: (1) what organizations are responsible for
DOD's management and oversight of space system acquisitions; (2) what recommendations
have been made for improvements to DOD's management and oversight of space acquisitions
over the last two decades, and what major changes have occurred in that time period; (3) what

1GAO, 2012 Annual Report: Opportunities to Reduce Duplication, Overlap and Fragmentation, Achieve Savings, and
Enhance Revenue, GAO-1=342SP (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 28, 2012).
2GAO, Space Acquisitions: Some Programs Have Overcome Past Problems, but Challenges and Uncertainty Remain
for the Future, GAO-1 5-492T (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 29, 2015).


GAO-16-592R DOD Space Acquisition and Oversight


Page 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most