About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-133170 1 (1972-03-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaagnu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                  COMTROLLZ ( NRALFTHrU 1!TCD STA




                              1 0LM096638           AR 15 i72
  Dear Mr. Chairman: ... ....              -

       Pursuant to our letter to you of June 16, 1971, and in
  continuation of our evaluation of the disposition of ship-
  builders' claims for price increases on contracts awarded by I
I the Department of the Navy, we haveexamined into the circum-
  stances surrounding the initiation, evaT-uti0n, and sIettle-     '5
  ment of five consolidated-claims made by the Lockheed Ship--
  buildin -and Construction Company. The claims amounted to c//
  $40.9 million as of August 22, 1969, and this amount was eval-
  uated by Navy technical personnel. Subsequent to August 22,
  1969, Lockheed informally revised 'the claims, which increased
  the total to $46.3 million. In May 1970 the Navy negotiated
  a settlement in the amount of $17.9 million.

       The enclosure to this letter contains information on
  five Lockheed contracts, including the types of vessels in-
  volved, contract prices, delivery dates, and claim settlement
  amounts. The contracts were awarded on a fixed-price basis
  in the total amount of $83.5 million. The final amount paid,
  however, including additional amounts for escalation clauses,
  change orders, and claim settlements, was about $121 million.

  LOCKHEED'S DEVELOPMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CLAIMS

       A company official advised us that Lockheed, upon real-
  izing that it was getting into a serious loss position on its
  Navy contracts, decided in 1966 to develop claims and to sub-
  mit them to the Naby for the recovery of additional costs.
  Lockheed believed that the losses had been cau-sed by actions
  for which the Government was at fault. During 1967 Lockheed
  established a team to develop claims for reimbursement of
  costs above those normally resulting from formal change or-
  ders or other written directions from the Navy.

       The claims were based on a number of underlying causes,
  such as late and defective Government-furnished material, de-
  fective or impossible Government specifications, late and de-
  fective lead-yard plans (working plans and other design data
  prepared by the contractor that had constructed the first ship




              BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most