About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-154258 1 (1974-04-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaafry0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Y                 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UN/T// -
                           WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548


    B-154258                                      APR 3 1974


    The Honorable Les Asp in
  ~House of Representatives
                                                      LM095925
    Dear Mr. Aspin:

         Your letter of October 2, 1973, asked us to examine the
    cost growth on the Department of the Navy's .2gcont  with the
 - Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, Newport News,
    Virginia, for the Nimitz and Eisenhower aircraft carriers
    (CVANs 68 and 69). This cost growth, appearing in the
    Selected Acquisition Report (SAR), was projected at $56 mil-
    lion. You noted that this amount included a $28 million
    increase in overhead and a $5 million increase related to
    other variables; you specifically asked us to determine
    (1) what items were considered overhead, (2) what caused the
    overhead increase, (3) whether charging this contract with
    increased overhead was justified, and (4) what the other
    variables were and whether they too were a proper c!arge to
    the contract.

         A Navy audit, late in 1973, projected a cost growth of
    $75.2 million at MIarch 31, 1973, of which $64.1 million was
    overhead. As agreed with your office, we are addressing the
    $75.2 million cost growth rather than the $56 million figure
    cited above.

         It should also be noted that the contractor, in its
    September 1973 quarterly report to the project manager,
    projected a cost growth (before adjustment of the incentive
    fee) of about $40 million greater than that projected by the
    Navy auditors. This difference is largely the result of (1)
    differences in the method used to project direct labor, in-
    cluding applicable overhead, accountinq. for 29 million,
    (2) overhead charges which the Navy anticipated would be dis-
    allowed in subsequent Government audits, accounting for
    another $2 million, and (3) differences in projected mate-
    rial cost, accounting for $9 millioo.

         In view of the considerable audit wnrk done by both
    the Defense Contract Audit Agency Ilud the Navy iii each of


                                       BEST       MIT MVA!LAULE

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most