About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-164250 1 (1974-05-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaafnz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                     COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED             lM.
                               WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548


      B-164250                    REFERENCE COPY         MAY 2 11974Q


                            Do not remove fProm the Reart
      The Honorable Les Asp: R.Ct4r  0: - ect~ S, SS
      House of RepresentativebaV 1e ost.  tritpty.

      Dear Mr. Aspin:

            The enclosed information is provided in response to questions by
      your office about selected aspects of the Safeguard Ballistic Missile
      Defense program. Safeguard is one of the Mrg-ramiias included in our
      a      elaluations of major weapon systems.

            At the time the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Mis-
      sile Systems was signed in May 1972, the approved Safeguard program
      consisted of a Ballistic Missile Defense Center at Colorado Springs,
      Colorado; deployment sites at Grand Forks, North Dakota, and
      Malmstrom, Montana; and advanced preparation of deployment sites
      at Whiteman, Missouri, and Warren, Wyoming.

            As you know, the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Mis-
      sile Systems reduced the Safeguard program from a planned 12-site
      deployment to two sites and the Congress later limited the program
      to only one site.

            The Army estimates that about $481 million of lost effort re-
/     sulted from the site reductions. Safeguard officials, however, have
      identified potential users for about $112 million of the excess equipment
      and nm'erial-,, Corps of Engineers officials estimate that about
      $110 million of the lost effort was attributable to termination and res-
      toration costs of the Malmstrom site. This site was about 10 percent
      completed when the treaty was signed.

            The enclosure also provides the information requested by your of-
      fice concerning the Army's handling of certain costs in the Safeguard
      Selected Acquisition Reports. The June 30, 1973, Selected Acquisition
      Rep-ort- coss a'tlTegories contained estimated costs applicable to the three
      sites which were canceled.

            The costs applicable to the canceled sites should have been elim-
      inated from the cost change categories in order to have established a
      meaningful cost trail between the May 1969 planning estimate and the
      June 30, 1973, one-site estimate. The reduction from the four sites to
      the one site was reported as a quantity change. According to the






                                                C 095l71

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most