About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-174284 1 (1971-10-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaafez0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNT
                               WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548

DEFENSE DIVISION
         B-174284                                           OCT 14i IM            r
                                                         III 11111   1111111111111 III 11111  lll IIII  /

         Dear Mr. Secretary:                                   LM095503

              On November 9, 1970, we sent you, for review and comment, a
         draft of a proposed report to the Congress entitled Questionable
         Need for Full Implementation of Plans to Construct Eplosive Pro-
         duction Facilitf-ley the Department of Defense (OSD Case 3200).
         By letter dated January 12, 1971, we received comments on the draft
         report from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Installations and
         Logistics).

              In our draft report we stated that, by using Minol-2 in place
         of Tritonal as the standard explosive fill for Air Force general
         purpose bombs, the TNT production base could be reduced from 30 to
         20 lines at a savings of $110 million in construction costs. Accord-
         ingly, we proposed that the need for modernizing TNT production
         facilities be reevaluated.

              In his reply, the Assistant Secretary agreed with our proposal
         and advised us that the original 5-year program for modernizing the
         TNT production base had now been extended to a 10- to 12-year effort.
         He stated further that the Department of Defense is reviewing and
         analyzing the Services' explosive fill requirements and the accept-
         ability of new or alternate explosives, but considers it prudent at
         this time to continue to modernize (i.e., construct new replacements
         for) the production facilities for TNT on a modular basis at Joliet
         and Volunteer Army Ammunition Plants.

              In our draft report, we noted that the possibility of reduced
         facility requirements resulting from changes in explosive fills was
         not fully explained to the Congress at the time the Department's
         program for construction of new modern TUT facilities was originally
         outlined before Congressional committees. For this reason we pro-
         posed to submit the report to Congress in order to inform it of the
         potential for significant cost reductions in future Defense spending
         by utilization of alternate explosive fills.

              Subsequently, this program was more fully presented to the Con-
         gress in hearings held by the Subcommittee on Department of Defense
         of the House Committee on Appropriations in May 1971. The Army


50TH ANNIVERSARY 1921-1971

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most