About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-175744 1 (1973-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadus0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
4            ----/-. -'--    4   -----,,I---'. ,O -  ,-                         .
                                     *I
                         COMPTNOlJ2zgXONilAL or Wt ti NITED Arn  659~ 7,;
                                   WAS11INOTONLU D 1NSW

              u-175744                       November 150 19711



              Hr. LeRoy T. Buchanan
              309 Sucter Street
              Portsouth, Virginia   23702

              Dear. Hr. Buchanan;

                   We refer to your letter of July 23, 1973p in which you
              raise certain questions with respect to our decision of June 6,
              1973, B175744p to you, sugtnluing the action-of Qutr Tranupor-
              tation and Claims Division which disallowed youtf/claim for
              -dditional per diem allowancein connection with'treporary duty
              you performed at the Philald'.phia Naval Shipyard in late 1969
              and early 1970. We are also in recetpt of correspondence from
              Congressman Robert W. Daniel, Jr., p in your behalf.

                   The facts in your case were stated in our decision of
             June 6, 1973, and need not be repeated here except as pertinent
             to the present discussion of the case, You have submitted no
             new information in the matter except to flate that you have been
             in contact with personnel from the Charleston Naval Shipyard who
             were on temporary duty in Philadelphia at the same time you were
             and who claim that they received per diem at the rate of 425
             per day for the entire period of their assignment rather than
             having it reduced as did you and others from the Norfolk   aval
             Shipyard.

                  You also rifer to our decision 33-177431, February 23p.1973,
             wherein it was t.e thit thie per diem of employeeo assigned to
             temporary duty tn Long Beach, Californiap was Improperly reduced
             oa the basis that current housing surveys had not baen made.
             Therefore, those employees were entitled to additional per diem
             for the duration of their asuignment# You question %bsther a
             proper survey wait made of available housing in the Philadelphia
             area at'the time of your temporary duty and ask' for the results
             of that survey-

                  As to your contention that employees from Cherleston did not
             have theirper diem reduced while on temporary duty in Philadelphia,
             we have been informally advised that the Comptroller of the
             Charleston Shipyard performed a spot check of the per diem paid
             Charleston employeis who were in Philadelphia at the time in question.
             It was found thnt, of the employees checked, all who had temporary
             duty assignmetein excess of 30 days had their per diem rateh%

C)'                                                  BEST DOCUMENT AVAII ARI F
                   9           9.tb.......

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most