About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-175430 1 (1973-12-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadsa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                    19)
                            COMPTROLJ ER GENERAl. OF THE UITED STATES
\;,       ..* V'                       / WASIIIaTOW, P.C. 0344

                                                      9i

               175430                                        eeb     1?*97


               Kr, John T. lcDonough
               35 Jersey Street
               Dadham, Hlacuachusetts 02026

               Dear Mr, NlcDonough:

                    Referenco is made to your tetter of September 24, 1973,
               with enclosure, concerning your claim that you are entitled
               to a higher rate of pay in connection with your reassigaent
               from a wage board position to a General Schedule position
               incident to a reductioi in force. Your clhim was the subject
               of our advance decivion, B-175430, June 1, 1972, which held
               that you are not entitled to a higher rate of pay since your
               rite of pay was fixed in accordance with departmental. rcguhations
               und pol.4;,id and within the allowable administrative dieoretion
               of the agency,

                    At the time of your reassirnint, the annusi equivalent
               salary of your w .ge board ?osicion was about ,11,690, tut due
               to a nichi differeitial you were receiving an annual equivalent
               splary of $12,168. You believe that night differential should
               have been included in the salary used to determine the
               compensation of your new position and that, accordingly, your
               rate rhould have been fbied at grade GS-9, step O, $12,l64 per
               annun, instead of the rate att w hich your salary i:a& adiriotra-
               tively established, 0,S-9, stop 7, $11,855 per annum.
                    Our decision of June I, 1972, sup, 3tated that for the
               purpose of determining 'te highest previous rate in a wage
               board poaltion %ehere the cnployac, is tr4nvferrlng xcom a wage
               bozrd position to a General Schtdule poiition, the night
               differential of the wage bo.ird poition should be in,.luded an
               part of the rate of bhosic pay. Our decision furtter %tatod that
               this meant that your etency had the authority to fix your snlary
               at the rate for GS-91 step 8, but that your rate was not fixed
               on the basis of your highest previous rate. You believe that
               your agency did not recognize night differential as part of
               basic pay and therefore incorrectly computed your rato of pay
               for your new position. Also, on the basis of a statenient of
               the.: Employwent Division that you were being promoted because
               your new hourly rat e;ould be higher than your previous Echadulod
               hourly rte and thu rtntemont oiI the Noti .cat'on of Personnel
               Action, cf&cctive Oeptabor 13, ).970, thn-t the action wnr. a
               P~ramot ih itli.4, you believe that the intent cof' :h4 perconnel


 .  l   wK)BEST DOCUMENT AVAI[ABOj

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most