About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-177724 1 (1973-05-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadpe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: N% 9,.1 COMPTh1OLLER GEMNERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WMHINGTON, D.C. MAO May 21, 1973 Arteoh Corp. 2016 Faufx Dr;Zvv ran. Churnh, Virginia 22042 Attrmtion: Mr. Xenry Bal President Gentlemen; Further refqrece iii a to your letter dated December 20, 1972, with enclosures, jproteist, 00 exclusion of yorv firm from negotiations ftr the aiard of ircont.mt'tor providing support of research and develop merit in' the field of environment and uurvival under request for quotations (MQ) DMD0-72Q-1778, issued by the Aberdeen Provino Ground c July 24, 1972. Since no awuad has ben made of this negotiated procurement, we must restrict oar rocitation of the factao Pracraph 3-507.2 of the Armed Services Proc-areznent flegulation (AMPR); 50 Comzp. Gt. 11 (1970). The solicitation required nubmisuoiw of quotations by August 22, 1972. Section '), m wt 1,t of the HYQ advised offerors that in order to be conidered for awardc, quotations must receive an acceptable rating base& upon the tsmluztini factors and in accordance width their relative im rtancO a et forth therein. Technical evaluation of the sir, pros poualu received on the scheduled date ws comploted on September 7, 1972, and two proporaaU were determined to be dthin the competitive range. Firms subnitting the remaining proposals were notified by letter dated Otober 17, 1972, that thecA proponul would not be considered further. Pursuant to a technical evaluation, It vus determined tht yor proposal mra not. within the corpetitive rangeo wd tht further diccursions irth your firm vonl4 serve no usefal purpose. Cm, Otober 26, 1972, you Advised the contracting ofTicer thit yo were protcntinj this deer.nIantion and by letter dated October 27, 1972, you not forth in detail tho baste for your protest. Vh Scrarce Selection Coknnttee vwj requested to specifically cc&mnt a n'ach statcenrt set forth in your protest letter so that a final decision could be made by the contraoting officer pursuant to ASPI 2-407.8 (a)(1). A reply to your protest was forwrde& to you by letter dated loccber 15, 1972# advising of the a4Tirmation of the original evaluati n of your proposa and providing further clarification as to uhy yuur prow posv.1%,a considcred technically unacecptoble. '\ 079/9

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most