About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-172682 1 (1974-01-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadnw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: A4 joa


      am



                          COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STA-TE
            -                       WASHINGTON.  z - o$&DP7



          B-1726C2                                             a     2, 1974



          Major General Francis S. Greenlef
          Chief, Nlational Guard Bureau
          Departnueuts of the Army and Air Purce

          Dear General Greeuief:

               We refer further to your letter of May 16, 1972, reference EGB-tS,
          concarning entitlenents of othervise eliibie National Guard technicians
          to discontinued service annuities and to severance pay when they are
          separated from their civilian positions as a result of the lot's of rilitary
          mer:bershlp due to failure on the part of the lational Guard t'.o accept
          their reenlitment applications even though they are properly qualified.

               You refer to our decision D-172682 of June 14, 1971, which held
          that National Guard technicians who tiere nilitry officer wer etitled
          to severance pay provided under 5 U.S.C. 5595 it otherv.tse qualAfied
          when they were separated fro their civilian positiona zts a restAt of
          losing their siliter, status as off kers or :arrant off cers beciiuse of
          nonselectitn for promotion. Separation because of nonlelection uias viewed
          as involuntary and not a removal for causes on charges of miscond.zct,
          delinquency, or inefficiency under thu termri of 5 U.S.C. 5595(b).

               You urge that a similar situation nay exist with respect to it
          technician who holds an enlisted military status and tho is not recained
          due to failure on the part of the htional Guard to acc(. t his roenl1st-
          wnat application if properly qualified, pointing out that there is a
          sinilarity between th. 'National Guard regulationto on the oelect ve retention
          of officer personnel and the prero3ative of State Adjutants General of
          not continuina enlisted nembers. You state the nction of the State
          Adjutants General may be based upon similar criteria and philosophies
          as applied in the officer selective ratention program. In general such
          actiotn by the State Adjuttmts General is said to insure(1) roteition of
          the most capable; (2) career incentive; (3) opportunity for adeanc=ec
          to highnr grodes at pzak years of an onlisted man's effectiveness; and,
          (4) individual and unit effectiveness to provide the nilitary operational
          capability required by the Depart:ents of the Ar7 and Air 1orce, In
          this cometion aee chapter 4, Ar..,w Regulation 135-205, entitled rnliuted
          Qualitative Retention Program (effective October 1, 1973).






              e,                                                          '1- .1 1cc r IeLr .
'Lr     Cf , 4 i (e 1 et- qo 1  ('n-i ) ref,    Sru4    c cfd   aC~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most