About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-178948 1 (1973-10-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadmt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: CO* PhOLLX. q OENRAL 04 ThUNITD STATES wAS4*4sN D.C.C - October 26. 1973 4P Htr. John Joseph oen N. *tiaUor at I 116 Austic Street CmbridaevHaachusetta 'Oi2 9 . Dear Kr. N*es For the reass that follov, we are denying your protest submitted by letter dated June 19, 1973, * behalf of LIUguttac Systeoms uc, (. a), £a4inst the jjectloA of -4 proposal, vithout referral to proceedLnc uader request for proposaA l (W) SS73-s5, tsued by e Social ad bhabiltatiap Service (SL), ashfinton, D, C. e* Ths orequired proposals for scaans and abetracting services of msetifle professional material in the. field of mmtal retardatio for qn warly publication of the Neutal Ratardaton Abstracts. The U, a total small buiness se-aside, stated ttat for the'% ** purpose of determsing the proposal that best serves tho Interest of the Goverac- awt * * W' the proposal evaluation crtiria would be oceetbird each fcr.? (1) tdchntcal qualification of propoaed personnel; (2) prformace and overall oxperience; and (3) reputatioc An carrying out similar tasks and degree of mdentanding of the project evidecced by the propomal. ' The edht proposals r eceived wars fozwacdad to a Technical Review - Panel for tochnical evaluation. On a poesibaLe scale of 3.0 pointa, tte technical review found only lerner Information Services, Inc. (Homer) acceptable at 2.66 points, Capitol S.ytri 9 .rcup, Lc,, capable of bein; umade acceptable at 1.66, and the other six offerors technically Unccept- bles LS1 and two firmw etrated 1.33, 6ubsequently, amrd wa made to lhar.ere .L$I states that on June 13, 1973, at ts request, the project . offier conucted a telephone conference to respond to LS5's nquiries concerning the reasons It was no warded the coutraat. Durinp the amvration, 1.S1 states that the project officer, v1ho was the non-voting Caira of the Zvaluation Paview oard, advtu.d that the Herner pro- Sposfl, alone was etnd echnically acceptable. H further sated that whila ancond proposal was found unacceptable,' but capable of boefk had. 94/ %%~' 7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most