About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-175633 1 (1973-05-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadmr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  .         ,    COMPTRoULLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                            W^SHINGTON. D M 23.4
                                                       3ole5


B-175633                           May 31, 1973



The Honorable Howard H. Callaway                  I111111I~I!I~11 !I fiII
The Secretary of the Army                                091844

Dear Mr. Secretary:

     We refer to letter AMCGC-P dated March 16, 1973, and prior
correspondence, from The Deputy General Counsel, Headquarters United
States Army Materiel Command, reporting on protests of Transvac, Inc.,
Cincinnati Electronics Corporation, Sentinel Electron~ics, Inc., and
Bristol Electronics, Inc., under invitation for bids (IFB) No. DAAB05-
72-B-0012.

     The IFB covered the procurement of a quantity of radio sets and
receiver-transmitters on a 3-year multiyear basis with 50 percent set
aside for award to labor surplus area concerns. On the non-set-aside
portion of the IFB, the four lowest bidders in ascending order were as
follows: Transvac (small business but not a labor surplus area concern),
Cincinnati (small business and a labor surplus area concern), Sentinel
(small business and a labor surplus area concern), and the Avco Corpora-
tion (Avco) (large business and a labor surplus aree concern). Bristol
submitted the sixth low bid on the non-set-aside portion of the iFB   In
accordance with the IFB provision setting forth the standard notice of
labor surplus area set-aside prescribed by paragraph 1-804.2(b) of the
Armed Services Procurement Regulation (ASPR), Cincinnati as a certified-
eligible concern is entitled to priority negotiation opportunity under
the set-aside portion of the IFB. However, the contracting officer
rejected the bids of Transvac and Cincinnati as nonresponsive. Pendinb
a favorable responsibility determination, the contracting officer proposes
to award the non-set-aside portion to Sentinel and extend to Sentinel,
a certified-eligible concern and low responsive bidder on the non-set-
aside portion, first priority for negotiation of the set-aside portion.

     For the reasons set forth in detail below, we concur with the
contracting officer's rejection of the Transvac bid as nonresponsive,
but do not agree that the Cincinnati bid is nonresponsive. However,
we do not believe that Cincinnati should be afforded an opportunity to
participate in the set-aside negotiations as a small business concern.
Moreover, we find no merit to the Bristol protest against any award to
Sentinel.


                                         PtXPhISUir'D DEC!S2ON
                                         52 Comp. Gen



                 t2 t                      k

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most