HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobaadbp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: ,'' - - . I ,.I ,
COMPTRmOLLxTQt Ii'AL OF THI-r UNITIED SThlB I,
R WA5HI~TON, PD41#-WH
A178583
June 14, 1973
Colonel U., U, blts
Acting Coamndar *
)Dfeos. Depot flachaafcbura
Dstense Supply Agency 4 ,
Dar Colonal Mltz
a dvce to hste
Your letter of MarcU 17, 1973' Udqbsta at4v ca a to hiier
Kr., dgar L, YAnborough may at this .th havi 199 hours of, Mnual
leave which vas forfeited it the t sd of thu 1972 leave .year ub-
stituted for ain equivalent uuibs o iou ', of wick leava chaigcd to
him during that leave yast, Mr. Kingboroush a. beca on sik leavei
sincel iy of 1972 and ' wedunrstan4 that he wva to be separatd f'or
disability riatrwaent La Hay of 1973. '.our letter states that vha
forfeiture of 199 hours arn lum ve] Iv i the result of au sdatids-
trativ*error, in ;lhicOa regard Wc, eKinmborousb explalis that he
Il- was not properly advisd of this status of hi's mnua leave anltount
,-. and that the nthstitutioa which he would othbnris;. hav erequeeted
Was not autom-t-ctafly nde bypu uatency.
In conerao,.mnual leave which as beaw% subjzlct to forfalture
at the end of a prior leave year may not be racroa'ctivaly uLati-
toad for sick 2Iove for hs sole purpose of avoiding that for
ftLure, ee Federal Perimllf Ususi, Chapter 6,30, vubcbcptsr 83-4.,
in 31 Camp. ou 524 (1952) io roco.ew xsd, hoever, tit Abscm.e
due to ilneas nay be charged to accrwad annual la4 t i til*ly wef-
quested by the play. nd approved by the adwijAMtrativ of fice
Scoacarnd,
lheie, as Lu tr. eIngsborough's case, an u'ploiea'u Lflnew
connnced c.vconzvidairableaperiod of tine prior to thond of a leavo
year, thus rocluding his use of ,,Acc.ued amual lamv&l for p U.pcSa
other than illness, we havo presumed that if ha. had t1'ucn advised
of'the state of his leave account ha would hava rau loted forfiLt-
able mAfual ave to be applied to cover an oq'atvdteni; paried of
absence prior to the clone of that leave yeali, V hers :ack ato
knouledge of his leave balwce Is not attrib'ts-lo to 'tny faulton
thpart of the eaployee, we hve interposed uo objct.on to the
subatitution of annual leave for an oquivalt amount of aick ,tovo,
uotilbotondtng that auch aanuzj. liars Tmy have bmn rejttrdud
C,N F N, ( ,. . ,& ,
t- '1 r1- ,x (,r( C<.](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobaadbp0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)