About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

EMD-77-59 1 (1977-08-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaacob0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                          DOCUMENT RESUME
 030 94I - [ 2313 4t62 1                ; (Or -

 Firs+ Federal Attempt to Demonstrate a Synthetic Fos il /nergy
 Technology, A Failure. EMr-77-59; B-178205. August 17, 1977. 6
 pp. + 2 appendices (16 pp,.),.

 Report to Pep. John D. Dingell, Chairman, House Committee on
 Interstate and Foreign Commerce: Energy and Power Subcommittee;
 by Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller General.

 Issue Alea: Energy: Pole of Fossil Fuels in Meeting Future Needs
     (1609).
 Contact: Energy and Minerals Div.
 Bdget Function: Natural Resources, Environment, and Energy:
     Energy (305).
 Organization Coneorned: Energy Research and Development
     Administration; Coalcen Co.; Ken-Tex Energy Corp.
 Congressional Relevance! House Committee on Interstate and
     Foreign Commerce: Energy end Pcwer Subcommittee.
 Authority: Federal Nonnuclear Research and Development Act of
     1974 (P.Al.. 93-577),.

          Questions were rdised by Congress concerning the Energy
 Research anO Development Administration's (EI:DA's)
 ainistration of d contract to demonstrate a process for
 converting coal to cleat boiler fuel, efforts to safeguard
 against organizational conflicts of interest in awarding and
 administering con+,-acts for fossil energy demonstration plants,
 and reasons for rejecting a proposal for a gasification
 demonstration plant. Findinas/Conclusions: The first Federal
 attemp: to demonstrate a synthetic fossil energy technology by
 converting coal to a clean burning liguid fuel had many
 technical and managerial ?roblems. It failed in its initial
 phase despite a $10 million cost overrun and a 14 1/2 month time
 overrun and was terminated on June 15, 1977. ERDA considered
 possible organizational conflicts of interest in awarding and
 aiministerirg contracts for the demonstration plants, but did
 not require lisclosure of interest statements or conflict of
 in+.erest clauses in awarding such contiacts. ERDA rejected the
 gasification demonstration plant proposal primarily because the
 compan7 was unwilling to accept the 50-50 Government industry
 cost-suaring requirement3. Recommendations: Tc avoid repetition
 of Lhe failure of the first attempt, the ERDA Administrator
 should: 1' adequately resolve significant technical problems
 before the demonstration plant phase is begun; 2) require the
 development and formal approval of project plans before projects
 are started and when changes are proposed; and 3) require the
 establishment and implementation of formal project monitoring
 systems which would enable ERDA management to track project
 progress and costs. To preclude possible organizational
 conflicts of interest, ERDA should develop and implement
 procedures requiring a formal, documented analysis of possible
conflicts of interest before awarding research ani development

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most