About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LCD-76-350 1 (1976-10-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaabzz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






          <RESTRND - ot to be released oeicide V-% ^--
          Accouni -A        c., !!. ~~, O 7
  *       by the O-t-w- ' f      .1W ...                          I7
* &~WASHING'roN. D.C                 Zm   ~          l~al 11 ',

   B-168700                             OCT 2 2 1976


   The Honorable Dominick V. Danielsj IlI IlhI
   Souse of Representatives                                    LM101102
   Dear Mr. Daniels:

       This is in response to your request for a review of the
   Army's Military Traffic Management Command's proposal to
   contract for all cargo handling at the Military Ocean Ter-
   minal, Bayonne, New Jersey. As agreed with you on May 19,
   1976, we limited our review to evaluating the Army Audit
   Agency's methodology for analyzing Army studies. These
   studies were used to justify contracting for work which was
   previously done by civil service personnel.
   BACKGROUND

        Army practice at the Bayonne terminal had been to proc-
   ess cargo both by contractor (about 88 percent) and by civil
   service personnel (about 12 percent). In February 1975 the
   Traffic Command completed a study to determine whether the
   mixed operation should be continued or whether the entire
   cargo handling operation could be performed more economically
   by the private sector.

        The decision to study this was in accordance with the
   Federal policy of relying on the private enterprise system
   to the maximum extent for products and services. That
   policy is set forth in the Office of Management and Budget
   circular A-76, which states that agencies should rely on
   private enterprise to supply their needs, except where it is
   in the interest of the Government to provide directly the
   products and services they use. One of the criteria which
   permits an agency to continue to provide a service in-house
   is that use of the private sector would result in much
   higher costs to the Government. Continuing an activity in-
   house should ordinarily be shown to cost the Government at
   l4ast 10 percent less than contracting for that-activity. A
   decision to continue to provide a service in-house, for rea-
   sons of cost, must be supported by a comparative cost analy-
   sis.
        The Traffic Command's study concluded that use of the
   private sector was more economical, and it requested the
   Army Audit Agency to review its conclusion.


                                                    LCD-76-350


14 1 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most