About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 91st Congress, First Session: Washington, Thursday, May 29, 1969 1 (1969)

handle is hein.death/crabdp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: United States                       o
of America  PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 9 ISt CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
Vol. 115         WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 29, 1969                No. 89

S. 2301-INTRODUCTION OF A BILL
TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY
Mr. HART. Mr. President, I introduce,
for appropriate reference, a bill to elim-
inate the death penalty for any Federal
crime. Joining me as cosponsors are Mr.
BURDICK, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.
JAviTs, Mr. MCCARTHY, Mr. MONDALE, Mr.
NELSON, Mr. PROXMIRE, Mr. WILLIAMS of
New Jersey, and Mr. YOUNG of Ohio.
Sentences of life imprisonment would
be substituted for provisions which re-
quire or authorize capital punishment.
Death sentences not executed when
the bill becomes law would be changed
to sentences of life imprisonment.
Mr. President, this is the third Con-
gress in which I have introduced a bill
to abolish the death penalty.
Since I first offered the proposal in
1966, the Nation has become increas-
ingly concerned, and rightly so, about
the rising crime rate. I share that con-
cern.
There will, of course, be those who will
say that, if I were concerned, I would
not seek to eliminate what they consider
to be a useful weapon in the war on
crime.
Mr. President, I would ask those per-
sons to examine closely'the reasons why
they feel the death penalty is of value
and remind them that we also live at a
time of growing concern about the effect
on our society of a steady diet of violence
on television.
An examination of those reasons and
the effect executions have on the human
spirit should convince them the death
penalty should be abolished.
Let me start with the human spirit.
Based on my work as a member of the
President's Commission on the Causes
and Prevention of Violence, I have be-
come convinced that continual exposure
to television shows involving violence
does have a connection with antisocial
behavior.
If it is true that fiction can brutalize
the human spirit, then certainly the fact
of one human executing the other can
have the same-if not greater-effect.
But we have long held that view in this
Nation.
We have shuddered when reading
about public   executions during   the
French Revolution and their effects on
the masses who watched.
We have recognized that public kill-
ings, whether sanctioned by law or not,
whether in the name of aggression or de-
fense of country, can brutalize the hu-
man spirit and we have carriea out our
executions in private.
Evidently we have not abolished cap-
ital punishment completely because it
has been felt that on balance the penal
and the nonpenal objectives of the death
penalty have outweighed the effects this
policy has on society.

to act as a deterrent, and few men have
a sense of imminency about death.
S 5818         As for precluding recidivism, it would
well be argued that once having com-
mitted a murder, a person, out of fear
of capital punishment, might actually
commit additional murders to prevent
Mr. President, if it were clear be ond   capture. These types of crime must be
doubt that capital punishment did          classified under the heading of recidivism
achieve penal and nonpenal objectives,     as well as crimes committed by persons
the debate over abolishing the death pen-  after serving jail sentences.
alty would indeed be one of weighing         It can also be argued that, inasmuch as
pluses and minuses,                        studies indicate that paroled murderers
But the fact is that proponents of re-   are no more and probably less likely to
taining the death penalty can only sur-    commit first degree murder than other
mise that capital punishment is useful in  paroled felons, capital punishment pris-
controlling antisocial behavior, and, in   oners, and other felons should be ha ndld
fact, the strongest case against capital   in the same way.
punishment, moral questions aside, is the    And, of course, if the death penalty
lack of a case for retaining this penalty,  does indeed preclude recidivism, it also
Mr. President, the most cited reasons   precludes the exercise of a prisoner's
for supporting capital punishment are      right to continue to try to prove his
that the death penalty:                    innocence after conviction.
Deters persons from committing crime       I have already touched on the question
punishable by death;                      of the death penalty as public ietribu-
Precludes recidivism by convicted mur-   tion.
derers;                                     If indeed public retribution were to be
Offers the public retribution for hei-  sought in executions, a premise I reject,
nous crimes,                              out of hand, the death penalty should n(,
I would like to deal briefly with each  only be carried out in public, but a.,
of these points,                          swiftly as possible so the crime is still
The debate over the deterrent objec-    fresh in the public's mind.
tive of the death penalty often resolves    Inasmuch as proponents of the death
itself into a discussion of statistics and  penalty cite the time-taking legal pro-
their meaning. Statistics comparing mur-   cedures open to a person convicted of
der rates in States with and without the  murder as protection against the execu-
death penalty support the contention      tion of an innocent man, proporcnts
that capital punishment does not deter    cannot argue retribution as a reason for
the would-be murderer,                    retaining the death penalty.
Proponents argue that it is impossible    Mr. President, each of these arguments
to estimate how many persons have been    in favor of capital punishment are based
deterred from  committing murder be-      on conjecture impossible of substantia-
cause of the death penalty, which, obvi-  tion.
ously, is true.                             To use such conjectures to take a
However, just because it is true does    man's life, to force other human, to
not make it a good argument for retain-    make a final decision about the life of
ing the death penalty, because it can be  another, to perhaps deprive an iiinoc',t
argued that it deters very few persons    man of his life, to continue to brutalize
indeed,                                   the human spirit is to undermine, indeed
For example, of persons sentenced to    to cheapen, the value of human life in
death during the last 10 years in Call-   these United States.
fornia, more than 40 percent were found     If this Nation stands for an  thinfe   it
guilty of crimes of passion. Fear of tl e.  staicds for the belief that the lile of c'ocli
guily o crmesof assin. earof ffe individual is to be cherished, whether lie
death penalty probably has little deter-  isdiich or po beacher     whe
rent effect on persons involved in such   is rich o   s poor, black or white.
crimes.                                     Statistics show that it is the black and
the poor who most often are senteiicctd to
Murders done while committing other     death, adding a new dimension to the
crimes usually are the result of reflex de-  case against the death penalty.
cisions in which time does not permit       Many other nations and    3 of our
thought of the death penalty. As a mat-   States have abolished the death penalty.
ter of fact, it could be argued that the    Congress should follow suit.
burglar shoots someone out c^ feat of be-   The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill
ing imprisoned, end that fear outweighs   will be   received  and  appropriatcly
the fear, at least for the rr  if 'A the  referred.
deatl1 penalty.    ,                       eerd
The bill (S. 2301) to abolish the death
It can also be argued generally that    penalty under all laws of the Unittc,l
fear of imprisonment is more real to the  States, and for other purposes, ito-
would-be criminal than fear of the death  duced by Mr. HART (for himself and at her
penalty, beeause the former penalty is    Senators), was received, read tv,io by
the more understandable. The imminence    its title, and referred to the Con miB L-,e
of a penalty must be understood if it is  on the Judiciary.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most