About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (February 22, 2024)

handle is hein.crs/goveokd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Con r s&on I~
inLu   ing I  legri  ive


~sear h Servt


                                                                                          Updated February 22, 2024

Managed Trade and Quantitative Restrictions: Issues for Congress


Background
Congress plays a prominent role in shaping U.S. trade
policy, due in part to trade policy's impact on the overall
health of the U.S. economy and specific sectors, the success
of U.S. businesses and workers, and Americans' standard of
living. Some Members  of Congress contend that past trade
negotiations and agreements have failed to address
effectively foreign protectionist practices and enhance
reciprocal market access for U.S. firms, farmers, and
workers. They cite as evidence the disruption of some U.S.
industries, difficulties of U.S. firms in penetrating some
foreign markets, and large U.S. merchandise trade
deficits-even with countries with which the United States
has a free trade agreement. They argue that the main goals
of U.S. trade policy should be to achieve fair and
balanced trade and to place more emphasis on measurable
results (e.g., increased exports and market share abroad).
To some  observers, the United States has been pursuing-
in certain areas-a managed trade policy that seeks
specific or numerical outcomes of trade by using, among
other things, the size of the U.S. economy as leverage. The
concept drew attention in the 1980s and early 1990s in
reaction to proposals and actions by Congress and the
Reagan  and Clinton Administrations to address the large
U.S. trade deficit with Japan and the market-entry
restrictions faced by U.S. firms there. Critics contend that
the most recent manifestations of a managed trade approach
by the Trump and Biden Administrations are the quotas
negotiated in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement
(USMCA)   on autos (through side letter agreements); the
quota arrangements that have allowed certain U.S. steel and
aluminum  imports from South Korea, Brazil, Argentina,
and more recently, the European Union, Japan, and the
United Kingdom,  avoid U.S. tariff increases stemming from
the use of Section 232; and more prominently, the Phase
One  Agreement with China, which committed  China to
increase purchases of U.S. goods and services by no less
than $200 billion between 2020 and 2021.
Today, some  proponents of this approach argue, as they did
three decades ago, that many trading partners are not
fulfilling their trade obligations or that current trade rules
do not address many barriers and distortive practices.
Therefore, the most effective way to promote U.S.
economic  interests, they argue, is to pressure countries to
agree to specific trade results.
As the Biden Administration implements or seeks to
enforce recent trade agreements and quota arrangements,
the implications of this approach may be of interest to
Members  of Congress.

What is Managed Trade?
Generally, managed trade refers to government efforts to
achieve measurable results by establishing-through
quantitative restrictions (QRs) on trade and other numerical


targeted approaches-specific market shares or targets for
certain products. These are met through mutual agreement
or under threat of trade action (e.g., increased tariffs). There
are various types and degrees of government involvement
in trade which might be termed managed trade, and
governments  often use different types of QRs to achieve
their trade policy objectives (see textbox).

         Quantitative   Restrictions on Trade
  Quantitative restrictions (QRs) on trade in goods are
  measures that limit the quantity of a product that may be
  imported or exported. They may be based on the number of
  units, weight, volume, and value. Major types of QRs include:
     Prohibitions. Bans on the importation or exportation of
      a product; such provisions may be absolute or
      conditional.
     Quotas. Measures indicating the quantity that may be
      imported or exported; quotas can be global or bilateral.
     Licensing requirements. Procedures that require an
      application or document (other than that required for
      customs purposes) as a prior condition for importation.
     Voluntary export restraints (VERs). Actions taken by
      exporting countries involving a self-imposed QR of
      exports; VERs are taken unilaterally or under the terms
      of an agreement between two or more countries.
 Source: P. Van den Bossche and W. Zdouc, The Law and Policy of the
 World Trade Organization, 3J ed., 2014.

 The Trump Administration, for example, stated that, by
 negotiating quota arrangements on steel and aluminum with
 South Korea, Brazil, and Argentina, purchasing targets with
 China, and potentially similar measures with other
 countries, the United States could ensure that trade with
 these countries was fair and balanced, and that U.S. imports
 were reduced to strengthen certain U.S. industries and boost
 employment. Some  Members  see this approach as a move
 away from a market-driven, multilateral rules-based system
 to a unilateral managed approach driven by arbitrary
 numerical outcomes and targets-one that could lead to
 increasing trade restrictions, retaliation or replication by
 other countries, rising prices, lower global economic
 growth, and erosion of the global trading system.

 Can   Managed Trade be E conormically
Justified?
Few, if any, nations completely practice free trade. Some
governments  intervene more than others in markets by
providing subsidies to domestic firms, restricting foreign
imports, or promoting exports. U.S. trade policy over time
has sought the elimination of these discriminatory or
unfair practices through trade agreements and rules-
setting. Advocates of managed trade policies have called
for increased efforts to influence trade flows between the
United States and certain trading partners, particularly


0

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most