About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (July 7, 2023)

handle is hein.crs/govemdv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional_______ a Research Servic Allen v. Milligan: Supreme Court Holds That Alabama Redistricting Map Likely Violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act July 7, 2023 On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in Allen v. Milligan affirmed two federal district court rulings that preliminarily enjoined the State of Alabama from holding elections under its congressional redistricting map because the map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The Court also reaffirmed the constitutionality of Section 2, as construed by its 1986 decision in Thornburg v. Gingles, establishing three preconditions for challenging a redistricting map under Section 2. Section 2 of the VRA generally prohibits any voting law or practice, including a redistricting map, that results in the denial or abridgment of the right to vote based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group. In accordance with Gingles, Section 2 may require the creation of one or more majority- minority districts-in which a racial or language minority group comprises a voting majority-to avoid minority vote dilution. In this case, the district courts preliminarily enjoined Alabama election officials from conducting congressional elections using the challenged map after finding that the challengers were substantially likely to prove that the map violated Section 2 of the VRA, and ordered Alabama to revise the map to contain a second majority-Black district to comport with Section 2. This Legal Sidebar discusses the Court's ruling in Milligan and concludes with an analysis of considerations for Congress. An earlier CRS product, Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Voting Rights Act Challenge to Congressional Redistricting Map and Stays Lower Court Ruling: Implications for Congress, provides background on Section 2 of the VRA and related Supreme Court precedent, as well as the lower courts' procedural history and decisions. Supreme Court Ruling in Allen v. Milligan By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court in Allen v. Milligan affirmed a decision by a three-judge federal district court panel, along with a related federal district court ruling in Allen v Caster, that preliminarily enjoined Alabama election officials from holding elections under the state's 2021 congressional redistricting plan because the plan likely violated Section 2 of the VRA. (This Sidebar, like the Court in Milligan, collectively refers to the two lower courts as the district court.) Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov LSB11002 CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most