About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (September 23, 2022)

handle is hein.crs/goveiwz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional Research Service
Informing the legislitive diebate since 1914

September 23, 2022
Homeownership: Tax Policy Options and Considerations

This In Focus discusses three selected demand-side options
and three selected supply-side options for potentially
promoting homeownership. Pursuing any of the presented
options would require careful consideration about the
specific design of each. This In Focus does not address the
economics or desirability of promoting homeownership.
For more on that topic, see CRS In Focus IF11305, Why
Subsidize Homeownership? A Review of the Rationales, by
Mark P. Keightley.
In order to increase the homeownership rate, tax incentives
must help households on the verge of homeownership
overcome the barriers they face-mainly the down payment
requirement and, in hot housing markets, high home prices
(relative to income). Demand-side policies may address
both barriers if properly structured, but may also benefit
those who would become owners regardless, or sellers that
respond by raising prices. Supply-side policies may address
high home prices by increasing the housing supply, but may
also subsidize construction that would occur anyway rather
than expand the overall stock of housing.
The impact of any tax incentive will vary depending on the
specifics of each market. For example: Is the supply and
demand of housing of the local market in balance? Is there
available land to build on? What are the state and local
zoning and land-use laws and building codes? Variation in
these factors across markets raises the potential that
modifying state and local housing policies could be more
impactful in certain markets. There is also the potential that
changes to federal nontax housing programs and regulations
could be more effective at promoting homeownership than
federal tax initiatives.
Tax Options and Considerations
Demand: Modify or Eliminate The MID
The mortgage interest deduction (MID) is the tax provision
most closely associated with homeownership. Current law
allows an itemized deduction for interest paid on a
mortgage secured by a principal or secondary residence.
Past proposals to reform the MID have included reducing
the maximum mortgage limit (currently $1 million or
$750,000 depending on when the home was purchased),
replacing the deduction with a credit, disallowing it for
second homes, and eliminating it entirely.
Most economic research indicates that the MID in the
United States and MIDs in other countries have little to no
effect on homeownership rates, but may encourage
purchases of larger homes. This is primarily because the
MID does not address the down payment barrier to
homeownership or high home prices (it may, in fact, cause
higher prices). Recent research suggests that removing the
deduction could increase the homeownership rate if home

prices, rents, and mortgage rates adjust in a manner that
makes it easier to become a homeowner. Thus, it is unlikely
any of the proposed modifications would significantly alter
the deduction's effect on homeownership, though certain
modifications could make it more equitable. For more
information, see CRS Report R46429, An Economic
Analysis of the Mortgage Interest Deduction, by Mark P.
Keightley.
Demand: Homebuyer Tax Credit
Proposals to provide a tax credit to assist homebuyers have
appeared over the years. Examples of bills that would
provide a homebuyer tax credit in the 117th Congress
include H.R. 2863 and S. 2820. A homebuyer tax credit was
available to first-time buyers from April 2008 through 2010
with the objective of stabilizing falling home prices
resulting from the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The credit
was originally $7,500, but was later increased to $8,000.
An advantage of a homebuyer tax credit over the MID is
that it more directly targets home buying compared to the
MID. A tax credit may also be more equitable since its
value does not depend on one's tax rate, as with the MID
(but may depend on the home's purchase price); does not
require one to itemize; and can be made refundable, which
can benefit more middle- and lower-income households.
Critics point to two issues with a homebuyer tax credit.
First, a credit may not help households overcome the down
payment barrier unless there is a mechanism to advance the
credit to buyers ahead of closing. Thus, a credit may benefit
those already positioned to become homeowners rather than
assisting those on the margin of ownership. Second, a tax
credit could exacerbate high home prices in hot markets if
sellers raise prices in response (and capture the credit's
benefit). To the extent this happens, homeownership would
be farther out of reach for more households.
Demand: Down Payment Savings Account
Allowing individuals to claim a tax deduction or credit for
contributions to down payment savings accounts may assist
more households in becoming homeowners than current
incentives do by directly addressing the down payment
barrier. Employers could also be allowed to make tax-
deductible matching contributions to these accounts.
Limited research on a Canadian program in existence from
1974 to 1985 suggests these types of accounts could boost
homeownership. Still, there are a number of issues with this
approach that policymakers may want to consider.
First, down payment savings accounts could lead savings to
be diverted away from other tax-preferred accounts used for
retirement, education, and health care expenses, as well as
traditional savings accounts households use, for example,
for emergencies. Second, these accounts may be of little use

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most