About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (June 29, 2022)

handle is hein.crs/govehxt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional                                            ______
R fesearch Service
Civil Rights Remedies in Cummings and
Implications for Title VI and Title IX
June 29, 2022
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) prohibit
various types of discrimination in federally funded programs and other covered entities. The Supreme
Court recently held in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller that a plaintiff bringing suit to enforce Section
504 and Section 1557 cannot recover emotional distress damages. Emotional distress damages are a form
of relief aimed at compensating individuals for emotional harm or injury caused by the unlawful conduct
at issue. As neither Section 504 nor Section 1557 contains statutory text specifying whether emotional
distress damages are available in a private suit, the Court interpreted the statutes in light of common law
contract doctrine to conclude that neither statute permits such a remedy. Under Cummings, it appears that
compensatory relief in a private suit will now be limited to recovery for economic harm caused by
unlawful discrimination under those statutes.
This Sidebar discusses the Court's analysis in Cummings, including its reliance on common law contract
principles to interpret statutes like Section 504, which the Court reads as legislation enacted based on
Congress's Spending Clause power. The Spending Clause basis and operation of several civil rights
statutes are more fully explored in other CRS reports. This Sidebar reviews the likely impact of the
Court's decision on the availability of emotional distress damages under other statutes, such as Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI) and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), and
potential considerations for Congress.
Legal Background: Private Suits and Remedies
The Supreme Court's reasoning in Cummings builds on judicial precedent and legislative action linking
together the remedial schemes of Title VI, Title IX, Section 504, and the Age Discrimination Act. Section
504 prohibits federally funded programs from discriminating against individuals based on disability.
Section 1557 prohibits covered entities from discriminating on the grounds prohibited under Section 504,
Title VI (race, color, or national origin), Title LX (sex in federally funded education programs), and the
Age Discrimination Act (age). Section 1557 also states that the enforcement mechanisms provided for
and available under Title VI, Title IX, Section 504, and the Age Discrimination Act apply to Section
1557 violations. In light of such legislative action and earlier judicial decisions, courts have generally
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB10775
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most