About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (August 4, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/goveefm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional ______ A'Research Service The Biden Administration's Immigration Enforcement Priorities: Background and Legal Considerations Updated August 4, 2021 Almost immediately after taking office, President Biden issued a series of directives on immigration matters. Some of these directives focused on altering the immigration enforcement priorities of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the agency primarily charged with the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Federal statute confers immigration authorities with broad discretion to determine when it is appropriate to pursue the removal of a non-U.S. citizen or national (alien) who lacks a legal basis to remain in the country. Resource or humanitarian concerns have typically led authorities to prioritize enforcement actions against subsets of the removable population (e.g., those who have committed certain crimes or pose national security risks). The Trump Administration made enforcement a touchstone of its immigration policy, and generally sought to enforce federal immigration laws against a broader range of aliens who had committed immigration violations than the Obama Administration. The Trump Administration also sought to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows certain unlawfully present aliens who came to the United States as children to remain and work in this country for a certain period of time. President Biden rescinded some of the Trump Administration's immigration measures, and also directed DHS to reexamine its immigration enforcement policies and priorities. DHS sought, during the pendency of that review, to restrict temporarily immigration enforcement actions to cover only certain aliens, and to suspend the execution of most removal orders for a period of 100 days. President Biden also announced an intent to preserve and fortify DACA. A federal district court, however, enjoined DHS's 100-day pause on deportations pending the outcome of a legal challenge to that action; and, in a separate case, the court ruled that the DACA initiative is unlawful. This Sidebar addresses the Biden Administration's immigration enforcement priorities and legal considerations that they raise. Congressional Research Service https://crsreports. congress.gov LSB10578 CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most