About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (April 2, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govecwx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional ______ a Research Service Revoking Hong Kong's Preferential Trade Status: Legal Framework and Implications Updated April 2, 2021 On July 14, 2020, then-President Donald Trump issued an executive order finding the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Hong Kong) no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People's Republic of China (China) with regard to specific laws listed in the Order, and suspending differential application of those laws to Hong Kong. One of the relevant laws, 19 U.S.C. @ 1304, sets out how products from other territories must be marked to indicate their country of origin. In response to the Executive Order, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a notice requiring all goods previously marked with Hong Kong to indicate China as their country of origin. Since this action, Hong Kong has initiated a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute against the United States, arguing the new marking requirements violate several WTO agreements. On March 31, 2021, President Joe Biden's Administration indicated that it intends to maintain the suspension of differential treatment of Hong Kong. This Sidebar presents the legal framework that applies to Hong Kong's status as a separate customs territory from China, and it analyzes the implications of the U.S. actions as well as Hong Kong's decision to initiate WTO proceedings. Although the former President's executive order suspended a number of other statutory provisions that gave preferential treatment to Hong Kong, these actions are beyond this Sidebar's scope. Background On May 28, 2020, the National People's Congress of China approved a decision authorizing its Standing Committee to enact laws to prohibit acts and activities in Hong Kong it considers to undermine national security. The same day, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States issued a joint statement expressing deep concern about China's decision, suggesting that such a law would dramatically erode Hong Kong's autonomy and conflict with China's international obligations to respect such autonomy stemming from, among other things, the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong. In addition, the U.S. Secretary of State issued a report finding Hong Kong no longer sufficiently autonomous from China to warrant certain privileges under U.S. law that allow Hong Kong to be treated differently than China. Thereafter, President Trump announced on May 30, 2020, that Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov LSB10488 CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most