About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (June 01, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govdaqu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




k


What Role Might the Federal Government Play in

Law Enforcement Reform?


Over the past few years, several high -profile police-
involved shootings and alleged instances ofexcessive force
have generated congressional interest in state and local
policing. Congressional interest in policing refornrevolves
primarily aroundthe public's confidencein the police and
accountability for exces sive use of force. What role should
Congress play in facilitating efforts to bolster confidence in
the police? Should Congress seek to improve law
enforcement's accountability regarding the excessive use of
force? Thesequestions are boundedby limits of
congressional authority.


The federalized systemofgovernment in the United States
limits the influence Congress can have over state and local
law enforcement policies.

The U.S. Constitution established a federal government of
limited powers. A generalpolice power is not among them.
That authority is largely reserved for the states. The
Constitution, however, does vest Congress with legislative
powers under the Spending, Commerce, Territorial, and
Necessary and Proper Clauses, as well as under the
enforcement sections of the Civil War Amendments.
Congress has exercised this authority in the past to enact
legislation that relates to law enforcement matters. Yet even
here, its authority is not boundless.

Congress may spend for the general welfare and thereby
encourage states to take or refrain from various activities. In
doing s o, however, the encouraged s tate action lmu s t relate
to the purpose for which federal funds are spent. Moreover,
state action may be encouraged, notcommandeered or
compelled. Commandeering and compulsion are also
beyond the s cope of the Comnerce Claus e, which
otherwise empowers Congress to regulate the flow,
ins trumentalities, and substantial impacts of interstate and
foreign comnerce. Congress may enact model legislation
for federal enclaves, but its reach there is geographically
limited. The Necessary and Proper Clause permits
implementing legislation, but only to the extent this
legislation reasonably relates to powers that the
Cons titution elsewhere grants to the federal government.
Finally, each of the Civil War Amendments-the
Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments-
conveys the power to enforce its pro visions by appropriate
legislation, butthatpower is cabined bytheterms of the
amendment and byjudicial interpretation of its breadth.


Tools Avwl~able to the Federa
Gwtvruw-n&memt to Promotes  Law

If Congress wants to influence localpolicing, it can hone at
least three items in the federal criminaljus tice toolkit:
policing-related datacollection by the U.S. government,
federal processes to investigate localpolice misconduct,
and the relationship between the Department of Justice
(DOJ) and police throughout the United States.



The federal government collects and disseminates limited
data on the use of force by state and localpolice. Several
programs gather this kind of information, but none collects
data on every useof force incident in the United States.

On January 1,2019, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
   (FBI) launched its use of force data collection system.
   The FBI programcollects data on incidents that result in
   the death or serious bodily injury of a person, or when a
   law enforcement officer discharges a firearm at or in the
   direction of a person. Law enforcement agencies are
   encouraged, but not required, to participate. The FBI has
   yet to release anypublications using thesedata.

 Every three years, in its Police Public Contact Survey
   (PPCS), the Bureau of Justice Statistics collects data on
   citizens' interactions with police, includingpolice use of
   force. While the PPCS produces reliable national
   estimates of police use of force, it is a survey, not a
   census of all such incidents. The most recent data
   available are from 2015.

 The National Violent Death Reporting System
   (NVDRS), administered by the Centers for Dis ease
   Control and Prevention, operates in all states, the
   District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Researchers in
   these states gather andlinkrecords fromlaw
   enforcement, coroners and medical examiners, vital
   statistics, and crime laboratories. The NVDRS can
   provide dataon deaths resulting fromlegal
   interventions.

 Congress passed the Death in Custody Reporting Act of
   2013 (DCRA, P.L. 113-242), which reauthorized the
   Death in Custody Reporting progran This act requires
   states to submit datato DOJ regarding the deathof any
   person who is detained, under arrest, in the process of
   being arrested, en routeto be incarcerated, or
   incarcerated at a lmunicipal or county jail, a state prison,


A A '2


Updated June 1, 2020

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most